On 1/18/2012 7:28 AM, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 18-01-12 12:02, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
In any case, I suggest posting the proposal to the user list and getting
reactions before voting.
Do you mean to say that we will stay on jdk5 when a user says no?
Personally, I would vote "+1" if only one user objects. We are at a
stage where having the java.util, and especially java.util.concurrent,
features that come with SE 6, would be really useful.
After all, we are not proposing yanking River away from anyone stuck on
SE 5. They would just not get be benefits of future development.
I'm just saying that we should take the vote after listening to the users.
Patricia
