On Sep 25, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Simon IJskes - QCG <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25-09-12 21:37, Gregg Wonderly wrote: > >> From my perspective, it seems that the most predominate step forward >> that we might take, would be to make all configuration used in >> services be visible to tooling on the outside which could then guide >> the deployment much more dependably and accelerate this small but >> currently oh so fragile set of steps toward getting River up and >> running in your environment. > > To me this reads like a mode where the 'easy' environment spits out a > configuration file, which if presented to the easy environment produces the > exact same result, and allows for editting to tweak things. Does it? That might be one of the things which happens. But, the annotations, ultimately, provide the metadata which defines the "parameters" of configuration which are valid. So, tooling of all different nature can use that meta-data. Gregg
