On 29 October 2012 10:15, Simon IJskes - QCG <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29-10-12 09:11, Dan Creswell wrote: > > That's not to say I'm down on the above at all, far from it. Rather I'm >> saying we'd need to look seriously at our deployment aspirations, the >> sources for services (do we really need third party services separately >> certified? Most banks take a different approach where they certify >> third-party code themselves) and the general "market-place" we wish to >> create. >> > > Wouldn't the problems be solvable if we only focus on closed user groups > connecting over the internet? > > Quite possibly - question is, who is that useful to and are they a "usefully large" chunk of audience?
No point in solving a problem that no one is interested in.... > Most if not all of the problems i see are from situations where you lose > control. Some implementations would create an enormous mess if left > unmanaged. But we shouldn’t scope it so big in the first place. It's to big > a chunk. >
