On 29-10-12 11:24, Dan Creswell wrote:
On 29 October 2012 10:15, Simon IJskes - QCG <[email protected]> wrote:
On 29-10-12 09:11, Dan Creswell wrote:
That's not to say I'm down on the above at all, far from it. Rather I'm
saying we'd need to look seriously at our deployment aspirations, the
sources for services (do we really need third party services separately
certified? Most banks take a different approach where they certify
third-party code themselves) and the general "market-place" we wish to
create.
Wouldn't the problems be solvable if we only focus on closed user groups
connecting over the internet?
Quite possibly - question is, who is that useful to and are they a
"usefully large" chunk of audience?
Developers of applications that need internet wide communication, and
jini services combined.
I'm not talking about a 'eco-system' of jini clouds, i would be very
happy if there are a few applications that are capable of communicating
jini style over the internet. Even without these few cooporating in a
greater system.
Chat applications, Remote sensor networks, Location updates, Voting
systems, anything that require realtime, retractable facts to be
communicated over the internet.
Gr. Simon
