On 09-11-12 00:31, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Ok, because it's small I think we can consider it, can you provide the
hooks to load different providers? The non default providers themselves
can be a subproject. We need to carefully consider security since we're
making it possible for downloaded code to resolve classes.
My SecurityManager and policy providers were developed in skunk, then
merged. URI changes were made in trunk, although this was a big change
semantically, the code footprint is small. For large changes to
foundation code we need skunk, not everything can be bolted on or
plugged in.
I have difficulty understanding what you are talking about. Could you
try again?
Gr. Simon
