On 09-11-12 13:48, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 09-11-12 00:31, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Ok, because it's small I think we can consider it, can you provide the
hooks to load different providers? The non default providers themselves
can be a subproject. We need to carefully consider security since we're
making it possible for downloaded code to resolve classes.
And this one? Do you want me to code hooks (spi?) in river-core so that
subprojects can attach?
I was basically saying in a very roundabout way that skunk has its
place, for more complex changes.
Or develop without intermediate commit, or run synced clone, or work
with own codebase, and reintegrate after proven use. Everything is possible.
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
