I agree with Gregs's reasoning here. Using a domain name one controls
for package naming is an important Java convention.
Patricia
On 3/11/2013 6:39 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
I'm confused - wasn't that domain transferred to the Apache Software
Foundation? And if so, shouldn't the foundation be renewing the domain
registration?
If not, I suspect that we should maintain it simply because our package
name starts with "net.jini". Who currently owns it? I'll chip in to
renew the domain registration, although I'm in agreement that any
content hosting can stop. If it helps, I can host a placeholder page on
my server. But I do think we ought to keep the domain reg.
Cheers,
Greg.
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 17:52, Peter wrote:
The jini.net domain name registration has come up for renewal again.
I'm wondering if anyone wants to take over as custodian?
Does anyone have any time or ideas to do something useful with jini.net?
Peter.