More than happy to contribute some North American pesos. I agree that as long as the packages are net.jini, at the very least the domain should be under control.
On 2013-03-12 2:39 AM, "Greg Trasuk" <[email protected]> wrote: > >I'm confused - wasn't that domain transferred to the Apache Software >Foundation? And if so, shouldn't the foundation be renewing the domain >registration? > >If not, I suspect that we should maintain it simply because our package >name starts with "net.jini". Who currently owns it? I'll chip in to >renew the domain registration, although I'm in agreement that any >content hosting can stop. If it helps, I can host a placeholder page on >my server. But I do think we ought to keep the domain reg. > >Cheers, > >Greg. > >On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 17:52, Peter wrote: >> The jini.net domain name registration has come up for renewal again. >> >> I'm wondering if anyone wants to take over as custodian? >> >> Does anyone have any time or ideas to do something useful with jini.net? >> >> Peter. >
