All qa suite tests are now passing
All jtreg tests that are known to pass are passing (those that depend on a Kerberos Domain server and Squid do not as expected).

To address concurrency,the issue of threads starting during service server construction (River-418), a new interface has been created:

com.sun.jini.start.Starter

Any service that uses the start package can now delay starting of threads until construction is complete. This prevents services from becoming visible to other threads before construction is complete, for compliance with the JMM.

All services except for Fiddler and Norm have been converted to use Starter, remaining services will be updated in River 2.3.1

A JIRA issue for each service will be created to document progress on Starter conversion.

Security Infrastructure changes:

      1. org.apache.river.api.security.ConcurrentPolicyFile - copied
         from Apache Harmony and refactored for immutable concurrency,
         all implies permission checks are performed thread confined to
         avoid synchronization issues with PermissionCollection
         implementations.  PermissonCollection's are not shared among
         threads.  Permissions are granted to Principals and CodeSource
         signed by Certificate and / or by URI, not URL, this avoids
         consulting DNS to determine URL identity.
      2. net.jini.security.policy.DynamicPolicyProvider has been
         reimplemented.

   Changes to Policy.getPermissions(CodeSource codesource) semantics:

   The contract for Policy.getPermissions changed in Java 6:
   <quote>

       getPermissions
       public PermissionCollection getPermissions(CodeSource codesource)
       Return a PermissionCollection object containing the set of
       permissions granted to the specified CodeSource.
       Applications are discouraged from calling this method since this
       operation may not be supported by all policy implementations.
       Applications should solely rely on the implies method to perform
       policy checks. If an application absolutely must call a
       getPermissions method, it should call
       getPermissions(ProtectionDomain).
       The default implementation of this method returns
       Policy.UNSUPPORTED_EMPTY_COLLECTION. This method can be
       overridden if the policy implementation can return a set of
       permissions granted to a CodeSource.

       Parameters:
       codesource - the CodeSource to which the returned
       PermissionCollection has been granted.
       Returns:
       a set of permissions granted to the specified CodeSource. If
       this operation is supported, the returned set of permissions
       must be a new mutable instance and it must support heterogeneous
       Permission types. If this operation is not supported,
       Policy.UNSUPPORTED_EMPTY_COLLECTION is returned.

   </quote>

   DynamicPolicy grants are no longer included when
   getPermissions(CodeSource codesource) is called, instead the method
   delegates to the underlying encapsulated base policy.

   ConcurrentPolicyFile getPermissions(CodeSource codesource) is
   implemented to return either privileged Permissions (CodeSource's
   granted AllPermission), or UNSUPPORTED_EMPTY_COLLECTION.   This is
   purely a performance optimisation, allowing
   ProtectionDomain.implies(Permission permission) to return early for
   privileged ProtectionDomain's without consulting the Policy provider.


Changes to ClassLoader infrastructure regarding codebase annotations:

  1. URL is no longer used as a Key in Collections.  This changes
     ClassLoading semantics slightly:
        1. Codebase annotations will be normalised as URI according to
           RFC3986 and compared for equality, remote code with
           identical codebases annotations will share a URLClassLoader.
        2. Previously codebases with different annotations would share
a URLClassLoader if they resolved to the same IP address. This made firewall traversal and codebase replication
           difficult and also prevented the use of dynamically assigned
           IP addresses for codebase servers.
  2. A new class org.apache.river.api.net.Uri has been provided to
     implement RFC3986 compliance, it was copied from Apache Harmony
     and updated to strictly comply with RFC3986.  This new class does
     not support Serializable and is final and immutable.  It can be
     serialized in it's string form and reconstructed remotely by
     passing a string to its constructor.   It has identical method
     signatures to java.net.URI.  Originally java.net.URI was utilised,
     however while it implements RFC2396 and RFC2732, it doesn't
     strictly comply and allows additional characters that should be
     escaped in RFC2396, this means that a strictly compliant RFC2396
     URI in normalized for may not be equal to a java.net.URI.  In
     addition java.net.URI didn't support escaped characters in host
     names, which would prevent registered domains from some Locales
     from being used in codebase strings.
  3. URL and URN are both URI, previously only URL's were legal, so the
     expanded form also allows URN to be utilised legally as codebase
     annotations, this includes Rio's maven artifact URN scheme.
  4. PreferredClassLoader no longer lazily loads the preferred list,
     instead this is loaded during construction.

While these seem like huge semantic changes, the end result is codebase annotations will still resolve to their correct ClassLoader as they always have, but instead of using DNS to determine an IP addresses (in the case of http and httpmd URL's), identity will be based on the RFC3986 normalized form of the codebase string. The ClassLoader will still use URL providers for resolving codebases. For the real oddball case, where a developer expects three separate domain codebase annotations to resolve to the same IP address and use the same ClassLoader, that won't work anymore.

This won't be rushed out the door, plenty of time will be allowed for testing.

Reply via email to