Misfired on the url below. The project at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/river/river-examples/river-examples/trunk is straight River, not the github url below.
Cheers, Greg Trasuk On Jan 8, 2015, at 9:12 PM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2015, at 8:17 PM, Dennis Reedy <dennis.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I don't know if pushing your River container approach is best for an >> example, but a stock River example with straight forward conventions allows >> developers to understand how to structure a project, how to build it, and >> most importantly how to test it. Without those basic fundamentals of an >> example it doesn't make much sense to pursue. >> > > I’m not pushing the river container here. The project in > https://github.com/trasukg/river-container-examples is straight River, with > the one caveat that (as we discussed on the list a few weeks ago) I have > pulled out the old com.sun.jini.start package to a different project, which > is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/river/river-rt-tools/trunk', and > renamed it to ‘org.apache.river.tools.rt.start’. I only mentioned the river > container examples to show that we’re in basic agreement on how to structure > a project that implements a service and client. > > Now if you ask me, the convoluted structure of a Starter-based project makes > its own argument for a container, but that’s a whole different conversation. > > But in any case, I’ll try to add the actual client and service examples into > the examples project in the next few days, and then I think you’ll see that > we’re really not disagreeing very much. I’m planning on yer basic > ‘hello-world’ service. > > Cheers, > > Greg Trasuk
