Hi Greg, I think we need to work in the qa-refactor-namespace branch. This is the branch I created that contains the namespace modifications. As far as the dependencies are concerned, if you want a source distribution, perhaps just checking out from subversion would suffice.
Regards Dennis > On Aug 7, 2015, at 442PM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote: > > > To start with, someone who’s familiar with that branch (I’m assuming Peter) > will need to move the existing trunk to a branch and then copy over > qa_refactor to the trunk. Then I think we need to discuss what to do with > the deep-libs folder. The build, test, and possibly runtime depends on jars > that are in deps-lib. From what I gather, it’s unacceptable to put jar files > into a source distribution, and somewhat discouraged to put them into svn, so > we should figure out whether we could use Ivy to get the dependencies at > runtime, or setup and document a separate download process for them. > > Cheers, > > Greg Trasuk > >> On Aug 7, 2015, at 2:54 AM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: >> >> Is there anything that needs to be done before calling for a PMC vote on the >> release? >> >> On 8/6/2015 11:56 AM, Bryan Thompson wrote: >>> Just release to encourage people to use it. +1 on release.for me. >>> On Aug 6, 2015 2:55 PM, "Patricia Shanahan" <p...@acm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Would it be useful to tag it as a 3.0 beta release initially, or just go >>>> to 3.0 and add point releases as needed? >>>> >>>> I will vote in favor of releasing it either way. >>>> >>>> On 8/6/2015 9:55 AM, Bryan Thompson wrote: >>>> >>>>> Or just release it. If problems emerge, people can report them and they >>>>> can get fixed. There is a known reliable release now. Let the community >>>>> vote by migrating their code. >>>>> >>>>> Bryan >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> As far as I can tell, the main remaining release blocker it getting more >>>>>> people to test in more environments. Perhaps we should put out an appeal >>>>>> on >>>>>> u...@river.apache.org? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8/6/2015 9:33 AM, Bryan Thompson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe it would be good to say a few words about the release goals for >>>>>>> 3.0? >>>>>>> I.e., 3.0 provides a deep refactoring that address performance, >>>>>>> concurrency >>>>>>> and scaling issues. Significant progress has been made towards the 3.0 >>>>>>> release target. X new tests have been developed for this release. The >>>>>>> remaining blockers for a release are .... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >