Are you opposing the whole idea of sending data and code (or
instructions how to download it) bundled together? (the spec)
Or just the way how it is done in Java today. (the impl)
If it is the first - we are in an absolute disagreement.
If the second - I agree wholeheartedly.
Thanks,
Michal
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
FYI in case you didn't know; Jackson ObjectMapper takes a POJO structure
and creates a (for instance) JSON document, or the other way around. It is
not meant for "any object to binary and back".
My point was, Java Serialization (and by extension JERI) has a scope that
is possibly wrongly defined in the first place. More constraints back then
might have been a good thing...
