The latter...

It works rather well for JavaScript in web browsers. I think that is the
most interesting "mobile code" platform to review as a starting point.

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 2:54 PM, "Michał Kłeczek (XPro Sp. z o. o.)" <
michal.klec...@xpro.biz> wrote:

> Are you opposing the whole idea of sending data and code (or instructions
> how to download it) bundled together? (the spec)
> Or just the way how it is done in Java today. (the impl)
>
> If it is the first - we are in an absolute disagreement.
> If the second - I agree wholeheartedly.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
>> FYI in case you didn't know; Jackson ObjectMapper takes a POJO structure
>> and creates a (for instance) JSON document, or the other way around. It is
>> not meant for "any object to binary and back".
>> My point was, Java Serialization (and by extension JERI) has a scope that
>> is possibly wrongly defined in the first place. More constraints back then
>> might have been a good thing...
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://polygene.apache.org <http://zest.apache.org> - New Energy for Java

Reply via email to