I'm wondering if I'm missing a step here. This is what I've done:
1. svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/river/jtsk/modules
2. cd modules/modularize/apache-river
3. mvn package
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:
[WARNING] The expression ${pom.version} is deprecated. Please use
${project.version} instead. @
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/phoenix-activation
of
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml
does not exist @
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/river-logging
of
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml
does not exist @
@
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project org.apache:river:3.0-SNAPSHOT
(/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml)
has 2 errors
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/phoenix-activation
of
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml
does not exist
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/river-logging
of
/Users/dreedy/projects/apache-river/modules/modularize/apache-river/pom.xml
does not exist
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
Is this what I should expect?
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 2:41 PM Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 8:07 AM Peter Firmstone
> <peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > I've been going through your patch, you've got a lot of work done in a
> > short time. :)
> >
> > I've just committed your changes.
> >
> > I'll have a look at the circular dependencies and see what I can do in
> > the coming week.
>
> Sounds good. I may also be able to free up some time to work on that
> some more. I thought I'd try slowly moving classes back to their
> original locations, from where I moved them to river-lib, and try to
> isolate the absolute smallest number of classes that are circularly
> dependent.
>
> Although it may turn out that you, or somebody else who knows this
> code better, may be able to just jump in and quickly work it all out.
> Hopefully that will be the case, and will moot the need for the
> exercise described above. :-)
>
> In any case, all of this is good for me as far as getting familiar
> with the River code in general.
>
>
> Phil
>
