+1, I have checked [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] License and Notice are correct in source package. [OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package. [OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. [OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. [OK] The code can be built success in the source package. > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: ShannonDing <[email protected]> > 发送时间: 2019-08-29 19:40:31 (星期四) > 收件人: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > 抄送: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > 主题: [RESTART][VOTE][#1] Release Apache RocketMQ Client CPP 1.2.3 RC2. > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for version 1.2.3 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP. > > > > > This release included main futures below: > > Support transaction message. > Support C style batch message sending. > Support getting error information when C API returns false. > Polish the TCP transport layer. > Remove useless code and fix compile warnings. > > For detail info, please see the release note. > > > > > The artifacts: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/1.2.3-rc2/ > > > > > Git tag for the release: > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/tree/release-1.2.3 > > > > > Hash for the release tag: > > dcf3a1f0b4c2b9826a391e40d053889ee4fafd91 > > > > > Release Notes: > > http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-1.2.3/ > > > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : > > BBC3FBA877D30832E2FBC8F901B994150CD1E262, which can be found in the keys file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > > > > Checklist for reference, > > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases. > > Fill in the following: > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > > [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > [] License and Notice are correct in source package. > > [] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > > [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > > [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > > [] The code can be built success in the source package. > > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this > email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > > votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > [] +1 approve > > [] +0 no opinion > > [] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > Thanks, > > The Apache RocketMQ Team > >
