+1

I checked:

-Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
-Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
-Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
-Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.

ShannonDing <ding...@apache.org>写道:
> 
> 
> 
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
> 
> This is the vote for version 2.1.0 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP.
> 
> This release is a major upgrade, mainly including message tracing for pub and 
> sub and support for higher version of GCC and add asan/lsan to check 
> memories. The stability of the core is further improved.
> 
> The artifacts:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/2.1.0-rc1/
> 
> Git tag for the release:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/releases/tag/2.1.0
> 
> Hash for the release tag:
> 
> aee285fa1948d15cc1c6a70109a151bd044bc51a
> 
> Release Notes:
> 
> http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-2.1.0/
> 
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> 
> BC9E172DE1BA5B24EBB4A628177B55985D75751B, which can be found in the keys
> 
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Checklist for reference,
> 
> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> 
> Fill in the following:
> 
> []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> 
> []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> 
> []  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> 
> []  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> 
> []  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> 
> []  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> 
> []  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> 
> []  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> 
> []  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> 
> []  The code can be built success in the source package.
> 
> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this 
> email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> 
> votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [] +1 approve
> 
> [] +0 no opinion
> 
> [] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to