+1 (binding) checked:
-Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package. -Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Binary package. -Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts. -Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. -All necessary files have license headers ShannonDing <ding...@apache.org> 于2020年3月25日周三 上午11:08写道： > > > Hi, > +1(binding) > As the release manager, I checked the RC1 following the checklist. > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to > this email, I sincerely hope to your feedback. > On 03/23/2020 22:31，ShannonDing<ding...@apache.org> wrote： > > > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for version 2.1.0 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP. > > This release is a major upgrade, mainly including message tracing for pub > and sub and support for higher version of GCC and add asan/lsan to check > memories. The stability of the core is further improved. > > The artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/2.1.0-rc1/ > > Git tag for the release: > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/releases/tag/2.1.0 > > Hash for the release tag: > > aee285fa1948d15cc1c6a70109a151bd044bc51a > > Release Notes: > > > http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-2.1.0/ > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : > > BC9E172DE1BA5B24EBB4A628177B55985D75751B, which can be found in the keys > > file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > > > > Checklist for reference, > > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases. > > Fill in the following: > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > > [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > [] License and Notice are correct in source package. > > [] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > > [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > > [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > > [] The code can be built success in the source package. > > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > > votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > [] +1 approve > > [] +0 no opinion > > [] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > Thanks, > > The Apache RocketMQ Team > > > > >
