+1, 
I checked
-  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
-  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
-  License and Notice are correct in source package.
-  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
-  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
-  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
-  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.


> 在 2020年4月7日,上午9:44,ShannonDing <[email protected]> 写道:
> 
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
> This is the vote for version 2.2.0 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP.
> This release support TLS mode with OpenSSL for sending messages in sync model 
> and consuming messages by push model and use an separate producer to send 
> trace messages. 
> 
> 
> The artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/2.2.0-rc1/
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/releases/tag/2.2.0
> Hash for the release tag:
> 6579eb637f81bca29f59f1e8645897a8c12a0871
> Release Notes:
> http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-2.2.0/
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> BC9E172DE1BA5B24EBB4A628177B55985D75751B, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> 
> 
> Checklist for reference,
> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> Fill in the following:
> [ ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [ ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [ ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [ ]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [ ]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> [ ]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> [ ]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> [ ]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> [ ]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [ ]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this 
> email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
> 

Reply via email to