Hi, +1 (binding)
I checked: - signatures and hashes fine - LICENSE and NOTICE looks OK - All necessary files have license headers - No compiled archives bundled in the source archive - Release note seems clear for me Best Regards, Von Gosling 金融通 <[email protected]> 于2020年4月10日周五 下午3:48写道： > +1, > I checked > - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > - Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > - License and Notice are correct in source package. > - License and Notice are correct in binary package. > > > > > -----原始邮件----- > > 发件人: ShannonDing <[email protected]> > > 发送时间: 2020-04-07 09:44:04 (星期二) > > 收件人: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > 抄送: > > 主题: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Client CPP 2.2.0 RC1. > > > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for version 2.2.0 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP. > > This release support TLS mode with OpenSSL for sending messages in > sync model and consuming messages by push model and use an separate > producer to send trace messages. > > > > > > The artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/2.2.0-rc1/ > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/2.2.0-rc1/>>; > Git tag for the release: > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/releases/tag/2.2.0 > > <https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/releases/tag/2.2.0>>; > Hash for the release tag: > > 6579eb637f81bca29f59f1e8645897a8c12a0871 > > Release Notes: > > > http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-2.2.0/ > > > <http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-2.2.0/>>; > The artifacts have been signed with Key : > > BC9E172DE1BA5B24EBB4A628177B55985D75751B, which can be found in the > keys > > file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > > > > > Checklist for reference, > > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking > releases. > > Fill in the following: > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > release. > > [ ] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > [ ] License and Notice are correct in source package. > > [ ] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > > [ ] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > [ ] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > > [ ] The code can be built success in the source package. > > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply > to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number > of > > votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Thanks, > > The Apache RocketMQ Team > > > </[email protected]></[email protected]> -- Nothing is impossible
