+1

I checked:
[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.


> -----原始邮件-----
&gt; 发件人: jinrongtong <[email protected]>
&gt; 发送时间: 2020-06-24 15:35:57 (星期三)
&gt; 收件人: [email protected]
&gt; 抄送: 
&gt; 主题: [RESTART][VOTE][#1] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.7.1 RC2
&gt; 
&gt; Hello RocketMQ Community,
&gt; 
&gt; This is the vote for 4.7.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
&gt; 
&gt; This release made some enhancements, such as the upgrade of fastjson 
version, improving the security of the system topic operation, optimizing 
master-slave replication, pull consumer, etc. This release also fixed issue 
about request-reply message. Finally, this release optimized a large number of 
documents and code style.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; The artifacts:
&gt; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.7.1-rc2/
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; The staging repo:
&gt; https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1047
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Git tag for the release:
&gt; https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/commits/release-4.7.1
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Hash for the release tag:
&gt; 9f95a972e10e0681bc3f2d00e9957aa212e897b5
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Release Notes:
&gt; https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.7.1/
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; The artifacts have been signed with Key 
&gt; EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys 
file:
&gt; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Checklist for reference,
&gt; Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
&gt; Fill in the following:
&gt; []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
&gt; []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
&gt; []  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
&gt; []  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
&gt; []  License and Notice are correct in source package.
&gt; []  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
&gt; []  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
&gt; []  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
&gt; []  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
&gt; []  The code can be built success in the source package.
&gt; []  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
&gt; []  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to 
this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of 
votes are reached.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Please vote accordingly:
&gt; [ ] +1 approve
&gt; [ ] +0 no opinion
&gt; [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Thanks,
&gt; The Apache RocketMQ Team
</[email protected]>

Reply via email to