+1
I checked??
[OK]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
[OK]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
[OK]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct


BR/Brant
------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????:&nbsp;"??????"<[email protected]&gt;;
????????:&nbsp;2020??6??28??(??????) ????2:16
??????:&nbsp;"dev"<[email protected]&gt;;

????:&nbsp;Re: [RESTART][VOTE][#1] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.7.1 RC2



+1

I checked:
[OK]&nbsp; Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK]&nbsp; Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK]&nbsp; Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current 
release.
[OK]&nbsp; Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.


&amp;gt; -----????????-----
&amp;gt; ??????: jinrongtong <[email protected]&gt;
&amp;gt; ????????: 2020-06-24 15:35:57 (??????)
&amp;gt; ??????: [email protected]
&amp;gt; ????: 
&amp;gt; ????: [RESTART][VOTE][#1] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.7.1 RC2
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; Hello RocketMQ Community,
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; This is the vote for 4.7.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; This release made some enhancements, such as the upgrade of fastjson 
version, improving the security of the system topic operation, optimizing 
master-slave replication, pull consumer, etc. This release also fixed issue 
about request-reply message. Finally, this release optimized a large number of 
documents and code style.
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; The artifacts:
&amp;gt; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.7.1-rc2/
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; The staging repo:
&amp;gt; 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1047
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; Git tag for the release:
&amp;gt; https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/commits/release-4.7.1
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; Hash for the release tag:
&amp;gt; 9f95a972e10e0681bc3f2d00e9957aa212e897b5
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; Release Notes:
&amp;gt; https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.7.1/
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; The artifacts have been signed with Key 
&amp;gt; EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the 
keys file:
&amp;gt; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; Checklist for reference,
&amp;gt; Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking 
releases.
&amp;gt; Fill in the following:
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current 
release.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current 
release.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; License and Notice are correct in source package.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; License and Notice are correct in binary package.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; The code can be built success in the source package.
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
&amp;gt; []&nbsp; Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to 
this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number 
of votes are reached.
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; Please vote accordingly:
&amp;gt; [ ] +1 approve
&amp;gt; [ ] +0 no opinion
&amp;gt; [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; Thanks,
&amp;gt; The Apache RocketMQ Team
</[email protected]&gt;

Reply via email to