+1 But we should clarify the RIP title. Some improvements look weird.
How about the new title: Improve the self-protection ability and RPC-level observability of remoting module Regards On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:43 AM Zhanhui Li <lizhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:55 AM zhimin li <lizhim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > > I have proposed some remoting module improvement in RIP, and it's time to > > start an email thread to enter the voting process. > > Links: > > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-49-RocketMQ-remoting-module-improvement > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number > > of votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > Thanks > > > > 在 2022/10/17 10:37,“aaron ai”<yangkun....@gmail.com> 写入: > > > > +1, Even though gRPC is widely applied in proxy and client, > > remoting-based > > protocol will not be discarded in the foreseeable future. > > > > SSpirits <ad...@lv5.moe> 于2022年10月16日周日 12:31写道: > > > > > +1, moving to vote > > > On Oct 9, 2022, 15:05 +0800, zhimin li <lizhim...@gmail.com>, > wrote: > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > > > > > Remoting module is a very important component in RocketMQ, which is > > used > > > for component communication. We want to do some optimizations on > this > > > module. > > > > > > > > > We have written the proposal and you can see it by the link below: > > > > > > https://shimo.im/docs/B1Aw1lnx7giVJLqm/ 「RIP 49 Some Remoting > module > > > improvement」 > > > > > > > > > Please reply to this email if you have any questions > > > > > > > > > >