+1

But we should clarify the RIP title. Some improvements look weird.

How about the new title: Improve the self-protection ability and RPC-level
observability of remoting module

Regards

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:43 AM Zhanhui Li <lizhan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:55 AM zhimin li <lizhim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> > I have proposed some remoting module improvement in RIP, and it's time to
> > start an email thread to enter the voting process.
> > Links:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-49-RocketMQ-remoting-module-improvement
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached.
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > 在 2022/10/17 10:37,“aaron ai”<yangkun....@gmail.com> 写入:
> >
> >     +1, Even though gRPC is widely applied in proxy and client,
> > remoting-based
> >     protocol will not be discarded in the foreseeable future.
> >
> >     SSpirits <ad...@lv5.moe> 于2022年10月16日周日 12:31写道:
> >
> >     > +1, moving to vote
> >     > On Oct 9, 2022, 15:05 +0800, zhimin li <lizhim...@gmail.com>,
> wrote:
> >     > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> >     >
> >     > Remoting module is a very important component in RocketMQ, which is
> > used
> >     > for component communication. We want to do some optimizations on
> this
> >     > module.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > We have written the proposal and you can see it by the link below:
> >     >
> >     > https://shimo.im/docs/B1Aw1lnx7giVJLqm/ 「RIP 49 Some Remoting
> module
> >     > improvement」
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Please reply to this email if you have any questions
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to