I agree with that, Let's focus on the specified issues rather than "some".

Xinyu Zhou <yu...@apache.org> 于2022年10月17日周一 11:57写道:

> +1
>
> But we should clarify the RIP title. Some improvements look weird.
>
> How about the new title: Improve the self-protection ability and RPC-level
> observability of remoting module
>
> Regards
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:43 AM Zhanhui Li <lizhan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:55 AM zhimin li <lizhim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > >
> > > I have proposed some remoting module improvement in RIP, and it's time
> to
> > > start an email thread to enter the voting process.
> > > Links:
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-49-RocketMQ-remoting-module-improvement
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> > > of votes are reached.
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > 在 2022/10/17 10:37,“aaron ai”<yangkun....@gmail.com> 写入:
> > >
> > >     +1, Even though gRPC is widely applied in proxy and client,
> > > remoting-based
> > >     protocol will not be discarded in the foreseeable future.
> > >
> > >     SSpirits <ad...@lv5.moe> 于2022年10月16日周日 12:31写道:
> > >
> > >     > +1, moving to vote
> > >     > On Oct 9, 2022, 15:05 +0800, zhimin li <lizhim...@gmail.com>,
> > wrote:
> > >     > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> > >     >
> > >     > Remoting module is a very important component in RocketMQ, which
> is
> > > used
> > >     > for component communication. We want to do some optimizations on
> > this
> > >     > module.
> > >     >
> > >     >
> > >     > We have written the proposal and you can see it by the link
> below:
> > >     >
> > >     > https://shimo.im/docs/B1Aw1lnx7giVJLqm/ 「RIP 49 Some Remoting
> > module
> > >     > improvement」
> > >     >
> > >     >
> > >     > Please reply to this email if you have any questions
> > >     >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to