+1 I checked: [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package. [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Binary package. [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] License and Notice are correct in the source package. [OK] License and Notice are correct in the binary package. [OK] rocketmq cluster can be start up correctly from bin package
ShannonDing <ding...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 13:47写道： > +1， checked： > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > release. > [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > [OK] License and Notice are correct in source package. > [OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > [OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > [OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > [OK] The code can be built success in the source package. > > At 2023-05-16 08:26:38, "jinrongtong" <jinrongt...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ. > > This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. > > The artifacts: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/ > > The staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193 > > Git tag for the release: > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1 > > Hash for the release tag: > e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd > > > > > Release Notes: > https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/ > > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : > EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys > file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > Checklist for reference, > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases. > Fill in the following: > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > [] License and Notice are correct in source package. > [] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > [] The code can be built success in the source package. > [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start > [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct > > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > Thanks, > The Apache RocketMQ Team > >
