+1

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:48 AM fuyou <fuyou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> karp <k...@apache.org> 于2023年5月17日周三 09:29写道:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I checked:
> > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package.
> > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Binary package.
> > [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > [OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > [OK]  License and Notice are correct in the source package.
> > [OK]  License and Notice are correct in the binary package.
> > [OK] rocketmq cluster can be start up correctly from bin package
> >
> > ShannonDing <ding...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 13:47写道:
> >
> > > +1, checked:
> > > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > > [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > > release.
> > > [OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > > [OK]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > > [OK]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > > [OK]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > > [OK]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > > [OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > > [OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > >
> > > At 2023-05-16 08:26:38, "jinrongtong" <jinrongt...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > >
> > > This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
> > >
> > > This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> > >
> > > The artifacts:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
> > >
> > > The staging repo:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
> > >
> > > Git tag for the release:
> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
> > >
> > > Hash for the release tag:
> > > e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Release Notes:
> > > https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > > EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the
> keys
> > > file:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> > >
> > > Checklist for reference,
> > > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
> > releases.
> > > Fill in the following:
> > >
> > > []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > > []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > > []  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > > []  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > > []  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > > []  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > > []  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > > []  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > > []  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > > []  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > > []  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > > []  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> > >
> > > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> > > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number
> of
> > > votes are reached.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > >
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>    =============================================
>
>   fuyou001
> Best Regards
>

Reply via email to