Hi, Got it.
> It still needs some work: 1,2,3..... Can we call the RC3 vote now(RC3 is ready) and leave these change points in next release? Regards, yukon On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > And there is issue being raised that EPL 1.0 is not compatible with ASL2, > > but RocketMQ has a dependency on logback which is under the EPL v1.0 and > > the LGPL 2.1 License[1], Does it ok? > > EPL is compatible with ASLv2 it just can’t be included in source form. [1] > > > Also could you please help us check the NOTICE file is correct or not? > > It still needs some work: > 1. There’s normally no reason to mention ASLv2 unless they have a NOTICE > file [2]. IF they have a NOTICE file that need to be looked at and portions > moved to our NOTICE file. > 2. When software is available under multiple licenses, pick the most > friendly license and use that. No need to mention the others [3] > 3. In general license information needs to go in LICENSE not NOTICE. > Notice is only reserved for a few things. [4][5] > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-b < > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-b> > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep < > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep> > 3. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#mutually-exclusive < > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#mutually-exclusive> > 4 .https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#required-third-party-notices < > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#required-third-party-notices> > 5. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice < > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice> > > >
