Hi Bruce, Thanks for your reply.
> Why do the NOTICE files make note of commons-lang including something from the Spring Framework? commons-lang has this in its NOTICE file[1], so we added this to our NOTICE file. [1]. https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/blob/master/NOTICE.txt > What is the policy for pointing users at Stackoverflow and Quora? I don't think this should be included in the README (In fact, we should create a users@rocketmq mailing list) Mainling list is the first place in the section `Learn it & Contact us`, and if Stackoverflow and Quora shouldn't be here, we will remove it next release. > About the file name The binary file name is a legacy issue, we will unify the source release and binary release file name in next release. Regards, yukon On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > * It's definitely odd to point to Maven central and Github for > incubating project releases > > It’s more than odd, it’s not in line with policy. You must point to the > primary source of distribution at Apache, Maven and Github can be mentioned > as secondary distribution points but should not take prominence over the > Apache links. > > Github releases are misleading as anything that is tagged GitHub assumes > is a release even though (at that point) it will not have not been voted > on. For example see [2] Please remove the link to GitHub release form the > REAME. > > > * What is the policy for pointing users at Stackoverflow and Quora? I > don't > > think this should be included in the README (In fact, we should create a > > users@rocketmq mailing list) > > Again users should be pointed the mailing lists first, then other places. > I think the REAMDE is OK here. > > > * Why do the NOTICE files make note of commons-lang including something > > from the Spring Framework? > > That’s correct see [1] > > > * Shouldn't the release artifact names both be apache-rocketmq-*.zip? > > ** Also, the binary artifact unzips to a directory named > > apache-rocketmq-all-* whereas the source artifact unzips to a directory > > named rocketmq-all-* > > There’s no policy on naming, it’s up to the PPMC but having apache in the > name is good from a branding and legal point of view. > > RE the README this is also still an issue with the "Apache RocketMQ > Community” section. The community is not at https://github.com/rocketmq > it is here at Apache! > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/releases
