Hi, Since our new vote has been opened for almost 72 hours and has 4 votes from initial committers, can we announce the result and call a vote in IPMC now?
Regards, yukon On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:36 PM, yukon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Please help review the Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC3, > > The RC3 artifacts: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/4. > 0.0-incubating-rc3/ > > Git tag for the release: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/tree/ > rocketmq-4.0.0-incubating > > Hash for the release tag: > dddc3daa2cbec4c7240d6525d2ce198826d29967 > > Release Notes: > http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.0.0- > incubating/ > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : E9BDDB0E, which can be found in > the keys file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/KEYS > > The maven release artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1003 > > The change points compare to RC2: > > 1. Add license notice for all the dependencies. > 2. Remove the 3rd party links in README. > 3. Polish bin/README file. > 4. Two PRs have been merged(https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/ > pull/50, https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/54) > 5. Add separate LICENSE and NOTICE files for binary release and source > release. > > If everything is ok, we will call a new vote for RC3 tomorrow. > > Regards, > yukon > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:59 PM, yukon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Justin, >> >> I got it, thanks. And I will carry out our conclusion soon. >> >> Regards, >> yukon >> >> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> > So we can use the LICENSE and NOTICE files of `master branch` version >>> for our bin artifact, while use the LICENSE and NOTICE of a old >>> version[1][2] for our source artifact. Does it ok? >>> >>> That looks right to me. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Justin >> >> >> >
