Yes, first three months, then quarterly. Since RocketMQ is group 1, your first quarterly report would be April. As a result, you end up reporting 4 months straight (which is normal, even for TLPs)
John On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:31 PM Von Gosling <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > Why not march, due to reporting group 1, could you describe in detail ? > > AFAIK, the incubator project and tlp project need to report at the first 3 > months :-) > > > 在 2017年2月21日，10:26，John D. Ament <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > Justin filed the report for February. RocketMQ will need to report > through > > April (due to reporting group 1) > > > > John > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:58 PM Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> So far we have only filed one board report because I did not realize > that > >> Incubator podlings were required to file reports for the first several > >> months. > >> > >> I have created the wiki page to collaborate on the next podling report > >> here: > >> > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/Podling+Report+March+2017 > >> > >> Please contribute to this report over the next few weeks and I will > file it > >> for March. > >> > >> Bruce > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Von Gosling <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Apologies for response until i read the latest board report. Next > month, > >> i > >>> will file a report for rocketmq podling process. BTW, Do we need every > >>> mentors to sign off? I found only justin mentor have done it.:-) Thanks > >>> mentors help for the last 2 board reports. > >>> > >>> > >>> Best regards, Von Gosling > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> 在 2017年2月5日，00:50，Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> 写道： > >>>> > >>>> Agreed, I would prefer to see current committers driving the podling > >>>> reports as it's good practice for the PPMC. > >>>> > >>>> Bruce > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:22 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Personally, I always prefer to see non-mentors create and submit the > >>>>> report. Mentors role is to review and approve, or provide feedback. > >>>>> Having it come from the full community makes it look a lot less > >>> top-down. > >>>>> > >>>>> John > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:05 AM Justin Mclean < > >> [email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Looks like Bruce who was dealing with it is currently MIA I’ll put > >>>>>> something together. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> BTW it up to the PPMC to come up with the report contents not the > >>> mentors > >>>>>> so any PPMC member could of jumped in here (for next time). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Justin > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> perl -e 'print > >>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" > >> );' > >>>> > >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > >>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> > >>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> perl -e 'print > >> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' > >> > >> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > >> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > >> > >
