Clear, thanks john explanation, we will report until the April.
> 在 2017年2月21日，10:36，John D. Ament <[email protected]> 写道：
>
> Yes, first three months, then quarterly. Since RocketMQ is group 1, your
> first quarterly report would be April. As a result, you end up reporting 4
> months straight (which is normal, even for TLPs)
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:31 PM Von Gosling <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Why not march, due to reporting group 1, could you describe in detail ?
>>
>> AFAIK, the incubator project and tlp project need to report at the first 3
>> months :-)
>>
>>> 在 2017年2月21日，10:26，John D. Ament <[email protected]> 写道：
>>>
>>> Justin filed the report for February. RocketMQ will need to report
>> through
>>> April (due to reporting group 1)
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:58 PM Bruce Snyder <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So far we have only filed one board report because I did not realize
>> that
>>>> Incubator podlings were required to file reports for the first several
>>>> months.
>>>>
>>>> I have created the wiki page to collaborate on the next podling report
>>>> here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/Podling+Report+March+2017
>>>>
>>>> Please contribute to this report over the next few weeks and I will
>> file it
>>>> for March.
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Von Gosling <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Apologies for response until i read the latest board report. Next
>> month,
>>>> i
>>>>> will file a report for rocketmq podling process. BTW, Do we need every
>>>>> mentors to sign off? I found only justin mentor have done it.:-) Thanks
>>>>> mentors help for the last 2 board reports.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards, Von Gosling
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 在 2017年2月5日，00:50，Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> 写道：
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed, I would prefer to see current committers driving the podling
>>>>>> reports as it's good practice for the PPMC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:22 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Personally, I always prefer to see non-mentors create and submit the
>>>>>>> report. Mentors role is to review and approve, or provide feedback.
>>>>>>> Having it come from the full community makes it look a lot less
>>>>> top-down.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:05 AM Justin Mclean <
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looks like Bruce who was dealing with it is currently MIA I’ll put
>>>>>>>> something together.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW it up to the PPMC to come up with the report contents not the
>>>>> mentors
>>>>>>>> so any PPMC member could of jumped in here (for next time).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> perl -e 'print
>>>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>>> );'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>>>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> perl -e 'print
>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>>>>
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>>>
>>
>>
