On 7/31/07, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. The usability issue of having a link to something that doesn't exist > since draft entries are unpublished and thus not available.
I forgot to mention, when the entry is a draft the link is not active/clickable. > 2. Alternatively, what if we removed the part on the status line that > contains the updated time "(Last updated xxxxx x-x x-x)" and put the > link there instead? This way we keep the UI more concise and still > provide the link. That causes the page to go too wide. If we are going to put additional information on that line, as a user I would prefer to use that space to display the pubDate for the entry. - Dave
