On Feb 5, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Dave wrote:
Sounds like we are in general agreement, which is good because I'd
like to get a 4.1 milestone build out ASAP.
More comments inline below...
On Feb 5, 2008 12:51 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Dave wrote:
Other projects call these builds snapshot releases. There is even
infrastructure in place to support snapshot releases in maven, for
example.
* Tagged in SVN
+0 It's not obvious that this improves our ability to track down
issues. If it only shows up on a milestone build and not after, does
it matter?
Yes, that is true. I would like to be able to reproduce milestone
builds, but all we really need is an SVN rev number for that -- and
the SVN rev number is now baked into the builds.
And can we streamline the voting process so
that it does not take months to also get a milestone release out.
How
can we streamline the process? One way is to NOT require a formal
vote
for milestone buildand instead just use lazy consensus.
Don't even vote. Just publish it.
Good, but just for the purpose of coordination, I think the person
making the milestone should at least say "I'm going to make a make a
milestone build this week, anybody object?" And if nobody objects in a
day or so, they should proceed with the build.
+1
Matt
