Dave, I am not really against using git, probably the way to go, just not on my own projects. Just prefere the svn way, tend to use the view svn compare alot and never really got to grips with git, the compare, switching branches etc. Its a different way of working, too complicated/much for my needs.
Yes the develop branch is the flow process to release. Cheers Greg. On 30 December 2015 at 14:42, Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM Greg Huber <gregh3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Don't use it my self, have tried but made just made a mess, so went back > > to svn. So -1 for me. > > > > btw, worth checking out what Struts are doing, using a develop branch, > > beforehand. > > > > How strongly do you feel about that -1 Greg? > > I took a quick look at Struts. They use ASF Git repo and is also able to > accept Pull Requests via Git. > https://struts.apache.org/submitting-patches.html. > > I'm not why they use a branch called "develop" instead of master, maybe > that is part of the "Git Flow" process they are using? > > Dave > > > On 28 December 2015 at 15:59, Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be > opposed > > > to moving Roller to Git? All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team to > > > switch us over. > > > > > > My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it > easier > > > to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would make > > it > > > possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Dave > > > > > >
