+1 and thanks for the info.

Cheers Greg

On 30 December 2015 at 16:11, Nicholas Padilla <
nicho...@monstersoftwarellc.com> wrote:

> Last thing,
>
> Here is a write up by the originator of the "Git Flow" idea.
> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/  Just to be clear,
> you end up having a master and develop branches.  The master only contains
> the approved production releases.  Features are managed in their own
> branches, using the create feature "feature", this can mean any change set
> gets a new feature branch.  When done, you finish feature and it is merged
> into develop branch.  After you are done with the versions features, they
> are all merged with develop, you can do a Release.  The Release process
> just takes the remote develop and tags it, with your provided version, and
> then merges develop with master.  That is a really quick summary of the
> process.  I am sure everyone can see the benefit behind using such a
> process.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Nicholas Padilla
> www.monstersoftwarellc.com
>
> “Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created
> them.”
> “Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important
> thing is not to stop questioning.
> <
> http://thinkexist.com/quotation/learn_from_yesterday-live_for_today-hope_for/222120.html
> >
> ”
>
> Albert Einstein <http://thinkexist.com/quotes/albert_einstein/>
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Nicholas Padilla <
> nicho...@monstersoftwarellc.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello All!
> >
> > Been a long while since I was active in the Roller community.  Since my
> > time with Roller, I have used Git heavily.  I do believe it is the right
> > solution to managing a code base.  If you use Source Tree, a Git client
> > provided by Atlassian, you will see the Git Flow button that allows you
> to
> > manage releases, feature branches, and hot fixes.  This process was first
> > outlined by this, http://datasift.github.io/gitflow/  It was intuitive
> > and easy to use, source tree just went a step further.  I use this
> > functionality daily to manage all my versioned projects, with the GUI
> > interface it makes it hard for noobs to make mistakes (Source Tree really
> > is one of the best Git clients).
> >
> > If you choose not to use Git Flow, that is fine, but using Git is the
> > right direction.
> >
> > Theres my two cents.
> > Happy New Year!
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Nicholas Padilla
> > www.monstersoftwarellc.com
> >
> > “Problems cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created
> > them.”
> > “Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important
> > thing is not to stop questioning.
> > <
> http://thinkexist.com/quotation/learn_from_yesterday-live_for_today-hope_for/222120.html
> >
> > ”
> >
> > Albert Einstein <http://thinkexist.com/quotes/albert_einstein/>
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:39 AM Greg Huber <gregh3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Don't use it my self, have tried but made just made a mess, so went
> back
> >> > to svn.  So -1 for me.
> >> >
> >> > btw, worth checking out what Struts are doing, using a develop branch,
> >> > beforehand.
> >> >
> >>
> >> How strongly do you feel about that -1 Greg?
> >>
> >> I took a quick look at Struts. They use ASF Git repo and is also able to
> >> accept Pull Requests via Git.
> >> https://struts.apache.org/submitting-patches.html.
> >>
> >> I'm not why they use a branch called "develop" instead of master, maybe
> >> that is part of the "Git Flow" process they are using?
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >> On 28 December 2015 at 15:59, Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Now that Git is officially supported by the ASF, would anybody be
> >> opposed
> >> > > to moving Roller to Git?  All we have to do is to ask the INFRA team
> >> to
> >> > > switch us over.
> >> > >
> >> > > My reasons for this move are mostly selfish: I prefer Git, find it
> >> easier
> >> > > to use and use it on all other projects. Also, a move to Git would
> >> make
> >> > it
> >> > > possible for us to accept GitHub pull-requests.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thoughts?
> >> > >
> >> > > Dave
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to