"packaging branch"? I do think some coordination (wiki?) is in order, because apparently we both spend a good deal of time on the same thing...
EdB On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > In the build.xml files, both are used. It is a separate work item to > shrink it down to one variable. And a separate work item to rename > everything. > > Until it is safe to push changes, you can use the packaging branch in > royale-asjs and apply the commits I pushed yesterday and see if you can > get things working. I don't doubt there are things I missed because of > how my computer is set up. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/28/17, 7:14 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >My guess is that neither is obsolete as both of them reside in > >royale-compiler. Maybe we just need to rename them to COMPILER_SWF_HOME > >and COMPILER_JS_HOME. But my compiler knowledge isn’t great so I’d wait > >for more educated answers. > > > >From: Erik de Bruin<mailto:[email protected]> > >Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 4:42 PM > >To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > >Subject: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME > > > >Hi, > > > >I'm confused (again) ;-) > > > >There used to be (way back when I knew about this stuff) two 'parts' to > >the > >compiler. Now there is only one repo... > > > >The documentation (READme) has info about two env vars - FALCON_HOME and > >FALCONJX_HOME - you can set if you install the 'parts' of the compiler in > >non-standard locations. With only one compiler repo in Royale, which one > >is > >obsolete? > > > >Thanks, > > > >EdB > > > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
