Examples are downstream of the sdk since they require the sdk. Some projects do have separate packages for examples to lower the download size, but I think we should at least bundle some key ones.
My 2 cents, -Alex On 10/2/17, 11:59 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >I was thinking that examples should be upstream from the sdk. They are now >in that they cannot be built with the sdk created first. > >However, the examples aren't actually "products" where you could agree the >tour is. If we introduce a new component there would be an example created >for it. If the tour could make use it, we would update the tour - at some >point. > >So I guess I retract my suggestion of making examples its own repo. > >—peter > >On 10/2/17, 2:46 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I don't see to much reason for having royale-website wiki - as long as we >>decide where actually documentation goes. >> >>Another repo for examples, does examples which we already have ? >> >>I believe that is good that we are shipping examples along with our >>framework repo - How we will ship that ? >> >>Piotr >> >> >> >>2017-10-02 20:32 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >> >>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. Github >>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a >>>way, >>> but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to use >>> Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They seem >>> separate and complimentary. >>> >>> Harbs >>> >>> >>> > On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>> > >>> > I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs >>>and >>> > put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would >>>work >>> > well. >>> > >>> > Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. >>> > >>> > ‹peter >>> > >>> > On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they >>>want >>> >> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1] >>> >> >>> >> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers. >>> >> >>> >> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does >>> anyone >>> >> see a reason for a wiki in those? >>> >> >>> >> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo? A >>>wiki >>> >> would probably be appropriate on something like that. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Harbs >>> >> >>> >> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> https%3A%2F%2Fissues >>> >> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138% >>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401%26 >>> >> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels% >>> 3Acomment-tabpanel% >>> >> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1 >>> 76d8%7Cfa >>> >> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688& >>> sdata=%2FSBh%2 >>> >> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0 >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>-- >> >>Piotr Zarzycki >> >>mobile: +48 880 859 557 >>skype: zarzycki10 >> >>LinkedIn: >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke >>d >>in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd35f8e77a8984d6848e908d509c5e80c >>% >>7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425667965210452&sdata=Ql8 >>Z >>4IdyCQY35l2AYY3z4eqyD%2FpivpLCynsdjE%2FtMbs%3D&reserved=0 >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link >>e >>din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd35f8e77a8984d68 >>4 >>8e908d509c5e80c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425667965 >>2 >>10452&sdata=lkdYzVxCTHWetc1OmKCaiocTfw0V5X%2B8LPea7%2FW8p68%3D&reserved=0 >>> >> >>GitHub: >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>o >>m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd35f8e77a8984d6848e908d509c5e80c%7C >>f >>a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425667965210452&sdata=dBsp9j >>p >>WZxrjIXSeskOWWC0w4B74rlkvd7lWJgOmRFw%3D&reserved=0 >
