This should make things simpler:
https://github.com/blog/2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing

Thanks,
Om

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:

> Not sure. I  notified infra per their instructions.
>
> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
>
> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
>
> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > Royale-docs has been created.  Can someone put in some initial content?
> > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages.
> > Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
> >>
> >> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Alex,
> >>>
> >>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
> >>> started
> >>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure where
> in
> >>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
> into
> >>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>> o
> >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
> >>> 2
> >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
> >>> 2
> >>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> royale-docs is good.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I prefer royale-docs
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Om
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Per Infra:  "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
> >>>> point
> >>>> to.
> >>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
> >>>> whatever
> >>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master'
> >>>> branch
> >>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> >>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo?  Anybody think it should have
> >>>> some
> >>>>>> other name?  "royale-documentation"?  I think it will hold our
> >>>> non-ASDoc
> >>>>>> user documentation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per
> >>>> Apache
> >>>>>>> Project.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.  Combining
> >>>> repos
> >>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work.  There should be examples in
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact.  IMO, TourJS would have its own release
> >>>> schedule.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e.
> >>>> Github
> >>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs
> >>>> in a
> >>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
> >>>> how to
> >>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components.
> >>>> They
> >>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
> >>>> royale-asjs
> >>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
> >>>> would
> >>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>> well.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ‹peter
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and
> >>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
> >>>> Does
> >>>>>>>>>> anyone
> >>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
> >>>> repo? A
> >>>>>>>>>> wiki
> >>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >>>>>>>>>> u
> >>>>>>>>>> es
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> >>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >>>>>>>>>> %
> >>>>>>>>>> 26
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> >>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >>>>>>>>>> e
> >>>>>>>>>> l%
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> >>>>>> 76d8%7
> >>>>>>>>>> C
> >>>>>>>>>> fa
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> >>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
> >>>>>>>>>> h
> >>>>>>>>>> %2
> >>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>
> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >>> skype: zarzycki10
> >>>
> >>> LinkedIn:
> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
> >>> d
> >>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> c2c1
> >>> %
> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
> >>> Y
> >>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
> >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
> >>> e
> >>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
> >>> d
> >>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
> >>> 7
> >>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>
> >>> GitHub:
> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>> o
> >>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> c2c1%7C
> >>> f
> >>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
> 9yybfI
> >>> 1
> >>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to