Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with
all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point.

Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that Olaf's
work can be used ?

Piotr

2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:

> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e.
> royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>) using CNAME entries:
> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/
> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/
> >
>
> > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure we have that choice.  I think we are part of an organization
> > and have to use a separate repo.  Maybe that's better because we have
> > several code repos.
> >
> > The repo is:
> >
> >  https://github.com/apache/royale-docs
> >
> > When you push it becomes available here:
> >
> >  https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
> >
> > Of course, I could be wrong...
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala"
> > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This should make things simpler:
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co
> >> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data=
> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446
> >> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
> >> 26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl
> VQ%3D&rese
> >> rved=0
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Not sure. I  notified infra per their instructions.
> >>>
> >>> Get Outlook for
> >>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.
> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> >>> aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9
> 2538%7Cfa7b
> >>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184&
> sdata=0KYVTdYNd
> >>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM
> >>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
> >>>
> >>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch?
> >>>
> >>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Royale-docs has been created.  Can someone put in some initial
> >>> content?
> >>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH
> >>> Pages.
> >>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Alex,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf [1]
> >>>>>> started
> >>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure
> >>> where
> >>> in
> >>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages or
> >>> into
> >>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting point ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>>>>> o
> >>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed
> >>>>>> 2
> >>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757
> >>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>
> >>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Piotr
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> royale-docs is good.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>>>>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I prefer royale-docs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Om
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Per Infra:  "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to
> >>>>>>> point
> >>>>>>> to.
> >>>>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or
> >>>>>>> whatever
> >>>>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in
> >>> 'master'
> >>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> >>>>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo?  Anybody think it should
> >>> have
> >>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>> other name?  "royale-documentation"?  I think it will hold our
> >>>>>>> non-ASDoc
> >>>>>>>>> user documentation.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one
> >>> per
> >>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>> Project.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.
> >>> Combining
> >>>>>>> repos
> >>>>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work.  There should be examples
> >>> in
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact.  IMO, TourJS would have its own release
> >>>>>>> schedule.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> >>>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website
> >>> (i.e.
> >>>>>>> Github
> >>>>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to
> >>> tourjs
> >>>>>>> in a
> >>>>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on
> >>>>>>> how to
> >>>>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the
> >>> components.
> >>>>>>> They
> >>>>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from
> >>>>>>> royale-asjs
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>> well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ‹peter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option
> >>> and
> >>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website?
> >>>>>>> Does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples²
> >>>>>>> repo? A
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> u
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> es
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> >>>>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> %
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 26
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> >>>>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> e
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> l%
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> >>>>>>>>> 76d8%7
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> C
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> fa
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> >>>>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> h
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> %2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >>>>>> skype: zarzycki10
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LinkedIn:
> >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
> >>>>>> d
> >>>>>>
> >>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> >>> c2c1
> >>>>>> %
> >>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu
> >>>>>> Y
> >>>>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
> >>>>>> e
> >>>>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e
> >>>>>> d
> >>>>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375
> >>>>>> 7
> >>>>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx
> >>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> GitHub:
> >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>>>>> o
> >>>>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C%7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35
> >>> c2c1%7C
> >>>>>> f
> >>>>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375726455&sdata=
> >>> 9yybfI
> >>>>>> 1
> >>>>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>

GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21

Reply via email to