haha, sometimes planets align Piotr! :) 2017-11-14 16:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>:
> Carlos, > > Just quick from me. Today I have found exactly the same :D :) > > Piotr > > 2017-11-14 16:25 GMT+01:00 Yishay Weiss <[email protected]>: > > > One thing that I found problematic with the mdl implementation was that > > there was a feeling of thin wrappers on a blackbox. Whatever default > theme > > we choose, I think we should implement it so the core functionality is > > easily understandable to an AS3 programmer with some CSS knowledge. That > > should also help create new good looking components (and themes) easier > by > > looking at the existing examples. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of > > Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 5:10:21 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: About Semantic UI and our UI Set + look-and-feel effort > > > > Hi, > > > > I was looking at Semantic UI and it has most of the things we want to get > > with our UI set + Look and feel effort. > > > > I need to investigate it more, but maybe we don't need to reinvent the > > wheel here. Supposing licenses are ok, we could base the new UI Set to be > > based on Semantic UI or make our own Semantic UI implementation. > > > > Regarding look -and-feel you can get most of the main actual look and > feels > > out-of-the-box (material, amazon, bootstrap, twitter,...) > > > > The main concepts behind are great as well: > > > > * Use concise and natural HTML > > * Intuitive JS > > > > https://semantic-ui.com > > > > It has already integrations with React, Angular,... > > > > Maybe our potencial is not in this area but in our composition concepts > and > > this could be integrated. > > > > This would need to make a new UI Set as we did with MDL, but this time > this > > could be the main UI Set since it could have all we need, different look > > and feels, all controls needed... > > > > We can as well use it to reach 1.0 and from there think if we need to > > create out own. > > > > Another thing to think about it is how this will deal with other outputs > > far beyond javascript (SWF, WebAssembly,...), maybe those outputs will > need > > to be develop by us > > > > Semantic-UI is under MIT license what I think is compatible with create > > what we need or take parts from here right? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
