The asjsc sets configname to "js". It is not configured to compile with the Royale Framework. It is only for raw AS->JS transpiling. Apps that use the Royale framework should use mxmlc.
HTH, -Alex On 12/13/17, 11:53 PM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Code completion in FB now working out of the box. Still have an issue [1] >running asjsc though. Note that FB recognizes Application but the script >doesn’t. > >[1] >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa >che.org%2FPkaw&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc073d5244c3a4a8c4c7008d >542c7c765%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636488348179522554& >sdata=alK66W8KLnCFp9bskeMoSRfTY%2B%2B5Wm0txR7%2FmToEm2c%3D&reserved=0 > >From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:54 PM >To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >Subject: Re: Repos and Releases > >The JSOnly package doesn't have Language.swc and other SWF support SWFs. >The difference between Language.swc and LanguageJS.swc is that the >Language.swc has definitions compiled with COMPILE::SWF,true. > >I've adjusted the templates to look for LanguageJS.swc first. > >Piotr, why is it important to remove the target folders? They are created >as part of the Ant build. A SWC is output in the target folder then >copied to frameworks/libs or frameworks/js/libs. Are you just trying to >save some size of the package? What do others think about filtering these >out of the binary package? Right now, no binaries are explicitly >filtered out of the source package build before creating the binary >package. > >Thoughts? >-Alex > >On 12/13/17, 2:30 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Note that I downloaded the binary version. Maybe building the src will >>result in a duplication. >> >>> In your >>>case it is weird that you don't have Language.swc in place. >> >> >>2017-12-13 10:40 GMT+01:00 Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com>: >> >>> My mistake, I downloaded the regular version, not the jsonly version. >>>So >>> now I’m able to configure royale-asjs as a js-only sdk, and run launch >>> configurations. The problem I’m seeing now [1] is that Language.swc >>>isn’t >>> where jsc thinks it should be (I have it under >>>C:\dev\royale\royale-asjs\ >>> frameworks\projects\Language\target) >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.a >>>p >>>ache.org%2Ffb3I&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f >>>0 >>>8d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578222154 >>>4 >>>09&sdata=4nofhHTHjmmfJb93tdcB3wWGZIgOIgF3GSQHSjqGtLw%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:38:41 PM >>> To: dev@royale.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>> >>> Actually, it was: >>> >>> cd royale-asjs/ide/flashbuilder >>> ant -f antscripts.xml setup >>> >>> I have updated the wiki to reflect this. I was able to import the >>>jsonly >>> SDK and create a new project that compiled without errors. >>> >>> I'll be looking into the code-assist issue next. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/12/17, 9:24 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>> >>> >On 12/12/17, 7:20 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >>Ok, I guess I was missing some context. Piotr’s upthread [1] link >>>made it >>> >>clear to me what the topic was about… >>> >> >>> >>So yes, royale-asjs siblings are recognized and it builds fine with >>>ant >>> >>all. >>> >> >>> >>I tried following the wiki for making it work with FB [2] and ran >>>into >>> >>some trouble. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> 1. The external tools under ide/flashbuilder have references to >>> >>$ROYALE_HOME (e.g. stringAttribute >>> >>key="org.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ATTR_LOCATION" >>> >>value="$ROYALE_HOME/ide/flashbuilder/antscripts.xml"/). I’m not sure >>>if >>> >>these are place holders for the build, or something that’s supposed >>>to >>> >>work on mac but on my windows machine I had to replace them with the >>> >>explicit path. >>> > >>> >Yes, the instructions for FB usage needs updating. I think you have >>>to >>> >do: >>> > >>> >cd ide/flashbuilder >>> >ant -f antscripts.xml >>> > >>> >Before importing the external tools. >>> > >>> > >>> >> 2. Code completing wasn’t working. Remembering this [3] discussion >>>I >>> >>tweaked flex-config.xml and am now getting tag completion in mxml, >>>but >>> >>not in AS3 scripts. I’m seeing this [4] in the FB log. >>> > >>> >It is still on my list to try to fix this. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>One thing I’m not clear about, which is related to (b) is whether we >>>can >>> >>use FB and similar IDEs with a JS only package. I had to run >>> >>InstallAdobeSDKs.xml which copies depends on playerglobal.swc and AIR >>>so >>> >>I’m guessing it needs flash. >>> > >>> >The JSOnly package should work in FB. I'll try it again and see why >>>it >>> >failed. >>> > >>> >-Alex >>> >> >>> >>Thanks. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>[1] >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> http%3A%2F%2Fapachefle >>> >>x >>> >>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs% >>> 2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fart >>> >>i >>> >>fact%2Fout%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d >>> >>5 >>> >>4173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >>> 7C636486888529206710& >>> >>s >>> >>data=4nfCQSPt9m3hp%2FqvZOGoPPvOk%2FdrzX0NARCILiOinNc%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>[2] >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>> >>o >>> >>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7& >>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui >>> >>% >>> >>40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d54173ee6d% >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>> >>7 >>> >>8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710&sdata= >>> Qdb0wUJFEhh%2BnnUZZiUVDXNHeLzB >>> >>R >>> >>%2FwV7d%2BmFsRxKmw%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>[3] >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl >>> >>e >>> >>x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FLAST-CALL- >>> Release-FlexJS-FalconJX-0 >>> >>- >>> >>8-0-tp61275p61654.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48 >>> >>c >>> >>9b0b708d54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364868885 >>> >>2 >>> >>9206710&sdata=rgtHk9T02d4%2BqFNjRiomfNph0KAZFmPv0bkFdl7P >>> 7xw%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>[4] >>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap >>> >>a >>> >>che.org%2Fmb8f&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708 >>> >>d >>> >>54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >>> 7C636486888529206710 >>> >>& >>> >>sdata=7zxTC0iyY5U6yDi9qUU0JKm5%2Fi6Q8Tz9v3BHmQ2cuVY%3D&reserved=0 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:15 AM >>> >>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >>> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>>I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll ask some >>>naïve >>> >>>questions: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be merged >>>into >>> >>>royale-asjs? >>> >> >>> >>The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all 3 >>>repos >>> >>into one package. IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs, >>> >>royale-compiler, royale-typedefs). >>> >> >>> >>> 2. If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone said >>>repos? >>> >> >>> >>It depends on what you tried. If you just cloned royale-asjs and run >>> >>"ant >>> >>all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run >>>"ant >>> >>all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it >>>doesn't >>> >>clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. Of >>> >>course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow. >>> >> >>> >>> 3. “Folks should have noticed that the >>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary >>> >>>package.” What’s the path to that folder? >>> >> >>> >>royale-asjs >>> >> >>> >>> 4. Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to the >>> >>>framework, in other words will re-building the framework from >>>modified >>> >>>source update this (3) folder? >>> >> >>> >>I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source >>>package >>> >>really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and the >>> >>binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 >>> >>repos after building everything. So if changes are detected today, >>>they >>> >>should be in this package too. >>> >> >>> >>HTH, >>> >>-Alex >>> >>> >>> >>>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>> >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM >>> >>>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >>> >>>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>> >>> >>> >>>I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3 repos >>>into >>> >>>a >>> >>>single source package. The nightly builds for the past few days >>>have >>> >>>been >>> >>>churning out this new package. Folks should have noticed that the >>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary >>> >>>package. >>> >>> >>> >>>I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like execute >>>bits >>> >>>on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others should >>> >>>review >>> >>>the package to see if they like it or not and report things that >>>need >>> >>>improvement. If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation into the >>> >>>scripts, we should get going on that now. >>> >>> >>> >>>Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one we want >>>to >>> >>>release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate. My >>> >>>current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source >>> >>>packages >>> >>>and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the release >>> >>>script >>> >>>in those packages. >>> >>> >>> >>>Constructive feedback welcome, >>> >>>-Alex >>> >>> >>> >>>On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it looks >>> >>>>good >>> >>>>till now. >>> >>>> >>> >>>>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant >>>build >>> >>>>for >>> >>>>a >>> >>>>while. >>> >>>> >>> >>>>Thanks, Piotr >>> >>>> >>> >>>>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Hi Piotr, >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop >>>branch >>> >>>>> locally. I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way >>>first, >>> >>>>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in the >>> >>>>>compiler. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the CI >>> >>>>>servers >>> >>>>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows >>>(the >>> >>>>>CI >>> >>>>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename). >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on feature/rename >>> >>>>>before >>> >>>>> the merge to develop. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks use >>>a >>> >>>>>clean >>> >>>>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders >>>and >>> >>>>> environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and >>>build >>> >>>>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the >>> >>>>>various >>> >>>>> READMEs first. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Thanks, >>> >>>>> -Alex >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> >>>>>wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >Hi Alex, >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not >>>sure >>> >>>>> >whether >>> >>>>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know. >>> >>>>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that check >>> >>>>>whether >>> >>>>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do you >>> >>>>>mean >>> >>>>>by >>> >>>>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did it >>>by >>> >>>>>maven >>> >>>>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient. >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and everything >>> >>>>>looks >>> >>>>>ok. >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all >>> >>>>>modules >>> >>>>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - probably >>>it >>> >>>>>should >>> >>>>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant. >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >Thanks, Piotr >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How to >>> >>>>>download >>> >>>>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It should >>> >>>>>describe >>> >>>>> >>what >>> >>>>> >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in order >>>to >>> >>>>>have >>> >>>>> >>SWF >>> >>>>> >> output. >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary >>>package" - >>> >>>>>It >>> >>>>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex >>>project. >>> >>>>>I >>> >>>>> >>believe >>> >>>>> >> there could be more people like me. >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> Thanks, Piotr >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui >>><aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one >>>post... >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, >>>the >>> >>>>>nightly >>> >>>>> >>>for >>> >>>>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but not >>>SWF >>> >>>>> >>>output. >>> >>>>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can never) >>> >>>>>bundle >>> >>>>> >>>the >>> >>>>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF >>>output. >>> >>>>>The >>> >>>>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the Adobe >>>bits >>> >>>>>after >>> >>>>> >>> you download them. >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that the >>> >>>>>source >>> >>>>>zip >>> >>>>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos >>>(royals-compiler, >>> >>>>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the >>> >>>>>JSOnly >>> >>>>> >>>binary >>> >>>>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" >>>nightly >>> >>>>>but >>> >>>>>in >>> >>>>> >>>a >>> >>>>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash >>>Builder >>> >>>>>and >>> >>>>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again >>>require >>> >>>>> >>>running an >>> >>>>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits. >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially >>>something >>> >>>>>you >>> >>>>> >>>choose >>> >>>>> >>> early when deciding what package to download. I'm not sure >>>how, >>> >>>>>under >>> >>>>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in >>>of >>> >>>>>the >>> >>>>> >>> SWF-only bits. Binary artifacts are supposed to be the >>>results >>> >>>>>of >>> >>>>>a >>> >>>>> >>> compilation of a source package. I suppose we could create >>>some >>> >>>>>sort >>> >>>>> >>>of >>> >>>>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly binary. >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven >>>users >>> >>>>>you >>> >>>>> >>>choose >>> >>>>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe >>> >>>>>airglobal/playerglobal >>> >>>>> >>> dependencies to your POM. These dependencies are in by >>>default >>> >>>>>for >>> >>>>>the >>> >>>>> >>> examples. Although it occurs to me that MDLExample shouldn't >>> >>>>>have >>> >>>>> >>>them, >>> >>>>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow. >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow >>>night. >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> HTH, >>> >>>>> >>> -Alex >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of >>>OmPrakash >>> >>>>> >>>Muppirala" >>> >>>>> >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> >>>>> >>> >wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that package >>>[1] >>> >>>>>and >>> >>>>> >>>have >>> >>>>> >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js. >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> >[1] >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%<<https >>>>>>>>>:<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c >>>>>>>>>%3chttps:> >>>>>>>>>//na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c> >>> https://n >>> >>>>>>a >>> >>>>>>>>>0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 >>>>>>>>>F >>>>>>>>>na01.safelinks.protection.outlook&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.co >>>>>>>>>m >>>>>>>>>%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>>>>>>>c >>>>>>>>>ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578222154409&sdata=pza1pv62ZBM4JLaRzsF7A7OJv9H >>>>>>>>>R >>>>>>>>>CliGr1jk7xOjGWQ%3D&reserved=0. >>> com/?url=http%3A%25%3chtt >>> >>>>>>p >>> >>>>>>s://na0> >>> >>>>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25> >>> >>>>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex >>> >>>>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01% >>> 7Caharui% >>> >>>>> >>> 40adobe.co >>> >>>>> >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae >>> >>>>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C >>> >>>>> >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ >>> >>>>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV >>> >>>>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>>>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> >That's good to know. I should be able to use this in the >>>npm >>> >>>>>package >>> >>>>> >>> >right? >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, >>> >>>>> >>> >Om >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala >>> >>>>><bigosma...@gmail.com> >>> >>>>> >>> >wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> Hi Om, >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are downloading >>>one >>> >>>>>zip >>> >>>>> >>>file >>> >>>>> >>> >and >>> >>>>> >>> >> using it in IDE. >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately? >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >>>>> >>> >> Om >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> Piotr >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala >>> >>>>> >>><bigosma...@gmail.com> >>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release package >>>all >>> >>>>>the >>> >>>>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file? >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, >>> >>>>> >>> >> > Om >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>> >>>>>wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the >>>better. >>> >>>>>The >>> >>>>> >>> >> decisions >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as >>> >>>>>possible >>> >>>>> >>>and >>> >>>>> >>> >>make >>> >>>>> >>> >> > our >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can release >>> >>>>>often. >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < >>> >>>>> >>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > I would also see in the develop Harbs >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your >>> >>>>>merge. >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow. >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> -- >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> Patreon: >>> >>>>> >>* >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>> >>>>>a >>> >>>>>t >>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 >>> >>>>>>>6 >>> >>>>>>>4 >>> >>>>>>>8 >>> >>>>>>>14 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D >>> >>>>>>>& >>> >>>>>>>r >>> >>>>>>>e >>> >>>>>>>se >>> >>>>> >>rved=0 >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >>< >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>> >>>>>a >>> >>>>>t >>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 >>> >>>>>>>6 >>> >>>>>>>4 >>> >>>>>>>8 >>> >>>>>>>14 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D >>> >>>>>>>& >>> >>>>>>>r >>> >>>>>>>e >>> >>>>>>>se >>> >>>>> >>rved=0>* >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >-- >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >Patreon: >>> >>>>> >* >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>> >>>>>a >>> >>>>>t >>> >>>>>r >>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 >>> >>>>>>1 >>> >>>>>>4 >>> >>>>>>1 >>> >>>>>>58 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res >>> >>>>>>e >>> >>>>>>r >>> >>>>>>v >>> >>>>>>ed >>> >>>>> >=0 >>> >>>>> >< >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>> >>>>>a >>> >>>>>t >>> >>>>>r >>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 >>> >>>>>>1 >>> >>>>>>4 >>> >>>>>>1 >>> >>>>>>58 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res >>> >>>>>>e >>> >>>>>>r >>> >>>>>>v >>> >>>>>>ed >>> >>>>> >=0>* >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>-- >> >>Piotr Zarzycki >> >>Patreon: >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat >>r >>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed4 >>b >>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578 >>2 >>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&reserve >>d >>=0 >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat >>r >>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed4 >>b >>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578 >>2 >>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&reserve >>d >>=0>* >> >
