I added it, but I haven’t been able to figure out the default browser location. Posted a question on the Eclipse forum. For now, users will need to manually fix the launch script by replacing $PATH_TO_BROWSER.
>I've thought about doing something like that, but personally don't want to >deal with figuring out which browser to launch. On 12/14/17, 12:34 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >I’ll try to add something. Can’t hurt. > >>I wonder if we should include a launch cofiguration [2] for showing it >>in the browser. > > >[1] >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% >40adobe.com%7C919de0c0e6d64fab7c5108d542cd8127%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c17 >8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636488372770026928&sdata=%2Bd9X3%2FInQbH0ZVgE5fVmGJrxzyd >cv47JTpmlkxmdSCY%3D&reserved=0 >[2] >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackover >flow.com%2Fquestions%2F3892862%2Feclipse-setting-up-run-configuration-for- >html-javascript-files&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C919de0c0e6d64fab >7c5108d542cd8127%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636488372770 >026928&sdata=Ckxw9je0r40nLKraeQx1lRxhS3QIuh7E1elFSYGCmbM%3D&reserved=0 > >From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:10 AM >To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >Subject: Re: Repos and Releases > >The asjsc sets configname to "js". It is not configured to compile with >the Royale Framework. It is only for raw AS->JS transpiling. Apps that >use the Royale framework should use mxmlc. > >HTH, >-Alex > >On 12/13/17, 11:53 PM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Code completion in FB now working out of the box. Still have an issue [1] >>running asjsc though. Note that FB recognizes Application but the script >>doesn’t. >> >>[1] >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap >>a >>che.org%2FPkaw&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc073d5244c3a4a8c4c7008 >>d >>542c7c765%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636488348179522554 >>& >>sdata=alK66W8KLnCFp9bskeMoSRfTY%2B%2B5Wm0txR7%2FmToEm2c%3D&reserved=0 >> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:54 PM >>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >> >>The JSOnly package doesn't have Language.swc and other SWF support SWFs. >>The difference between Language.swc and LanguageJS.swc is that the >>Language.swc has definitions compiled with COMPILE::SWF,true. >> >>I've adjusted the templates to look for LanguageJS.swc first. >> >>Piotr, why is it important to remove the target folders? They are >>created >>as part of the Ant build. A SWC is output in the target folder then >>copied to frameworks/libs or frameworks/js/libs. Are you just trying to >>save some size of the package? What do others think about filtering >>these >>out of the binary package? Right now, no binaries are explicitly >>filtered out of the source package build before creating the binary >>package. >> >>Thoughts? >>-Alex >> >>On 12/13/17, 2:30 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Note that I downloaded the binary version. Maybe building the src will >>>result in a duplication. >>> >>>> In your >>>>case it is weird that you don't have Language.swc in place. >>> >>> >>>2017-12-13 10:40 GMT+01:00 Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com>: >>> >>>> My mistake, I downloaded the regular version, not the jsonly version. >>>>So >>>> now I’m able to configure royale-asjs as a js-only sdk, and run launch >>>> configurations. The problem I’m seeing now [1] is that Language.swc >>>>isn’t >>>> where jsc thinks it should be (I have it under >>>>C:\dev\royale\royale-asjs\ >>>> frameworks\projects\Language\target) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] >>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste. >>>>a >>>>p >>>>ache.org%2Ffb3I&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02 >>>>f >>>>0 >>>>8d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648757822215 >>>>4 >>>>4 >>>>09&sdata=4nofhHTHjmmfJb93tdcB3wWGZIgOIgF3GSQHSjqGtLw%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:38:41 PM >>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>>> >>>> Actually, it was: >>>> >>>> cd royale-asjs/ide/flashbuilder >>>> ant -f antscripts.xml setup >>>> >>>> I have updated the wiki to reflect this. I was able to import the >>>>jsonly >>>> SDK and create a new project that compiled without errors. >>>> >>>> I'll be looking into the code-assist issue next. >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/12/17, 9:24 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>> >>>> >On 12/12/17, 7:20 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>Ok, I guess I was missing some context. Piotr’s upthread [1] link >>>>made it >>>> >>clear to me what the topic was about… >>>> >> >>>> >>So yes, royale-asjs siblings are recognized and it builds fine with >>>>ant >>>> >>all. >>>> >> >>>> >>I tried following the wiki for making it work with FB [2] and ran >>>>into >>>> >>some trouble. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> 1. The external tools under ide/flashbuilder have references to >>>> >>$ROYALE_HOME (e.g. stringAttribute >>>> >>key="org.eclipse.ui.externaltools.ATTR_LOCATION" >>>> >>value="$ROYALE_HOME/ide/flashbuilder/antscripts.xml"/). I’m not sure >>>>if >>>> >>these are place holders for the build, or something that’s supposed >>>>to >>>> >>work on mac but on my windows machine I had to replace them with the >>>> >>explicit path. >>>> > >>>> >Yes, the instructions for FB usage needs updating. I think you have >>>>to >>>> >do: >>>> > >>>> >cd ide/flashbuilder >>>> >ant -f antscripts.xml >>>> > >>>> >Before importing the external tools. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >> 2. Code completing wasn’t working. Remembering this [3] >>>>discussion >>>>I >>>> >>tweaked flex-config.xml and am now getting tag completion in mxml, >>>>but >>>> >>not in AS3 scripts. I’m seeing this [4] in the FB log. >>>> > >>>> >It is still on my list to try to fix this. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>One thing I’m not clear about, which is related to (b) is whether we >>>>can >>>> >>use FB and similar IDEs with a JS only package. I had to run >>>> >>InstallAdobeSDKs.xml which copies depends on playerglobal.swc and >>>>AIR >>>>so >>>> >>I’m guessing it needs flash. >>>> > >>>> >The JSOnly package should work in FB. I'll try it again and see why >>>>it >>>> >failed. >>>> > >>>> >-Alex >>>> >> >>>> >>Thanks. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>[1] >>>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapachefle >>>> >>x >>>> >>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs% >>>> 2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fart >>>> >>i >>>> >>fact%2Fout%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d >>>> >>5 >>>> >>4173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >>>> 7C636486888529206710& >>>> >>s >>>> >>data=4nfCQSPt9m3hp%2FqvZOGoPPvOk%2FdrzX0NARCILiOinNc%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>[2] >>>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>>> >>o >>>> >>m%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FFlash-Builder-4.7& >>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui >>>> >>% >>>> >>40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d54173ee6d% >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>>> >>7 >>>> >>8decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710&sdata= >>>> Qdb0wUJFEhh%2BnnUZZiUVDXNHeLzB >>>> >>R >>>> >>%2FwV7d%2BmFsRxKmw%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>[3] >>>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl >>>> >>e >>>> >>x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FLAST-CALL- >>>> Release-FlexJS-FalconJX-0 >>>> >>- >>>> >>8-0-tp61275p61654.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48 >>>> >>c >>>> >>9b0b708d54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364868885 >>>> >>2 >>>> >>9206710&sdata=rgtHk9T02d4%2BqFNjRiomfNph0KAZFmPv0bkFdl7P >>>> 7xw%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>[4] >>>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.ap >>>> >>a >>>> >>che.org%2Fmb8f&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% >>>> 7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708 >>>> >>d >>>> >>54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >>>> 7C636486888529206710 >>>> >>& >>>> >>sdata=7zxTC0iyY5U6yDi9qUU0JKm5%2Fi6Q8Tz9v3BHmQ2cuVY%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:15 AM >>>> >>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >>>> >>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>On 12/12/17, 12:06 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>>I’m trying to understand what’s going on here, so I’ll ask some >>>>naïve >>>> >>>questions: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> 1. Are royale-compiler and royale-typedefs supposed to be merged >>>>into >>>> >>>royale-asjs? >>>> >> >>>> >>The current package doesn't "merge" as much as it co-packages all 3 >>>>repos >>>> >>into one package. IOW, the package has 3 subfolders (royale-asjs, >>>> >>royale-compiler, royale-typedefs). >>>> >> >>>> >>> 2. If so, why does running ant all from royale-asjs clone said >>>>repos? >>>> >> >>>> >>It depends on what you tried. If you just cloned royale-asjs and >>>>run >>>> >>"ant >>>> >>all", the script will still clone the repos, but for me, if I run >>>>"ant >>>> >>all" in the royale-asjs folder of the nightly source package, it >>>>doesn't >>>> >>clone the repos as it finds royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. Of >>>> >>course, something might have broken so I will verify that tomorrow. >>>> >> >>>> >>> 3. “Folks should have noticed that the >>>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary >>>> >>>package.” What’s the path to that folder? >>>> >> >>>> >>royale-asjs >>>> >> >>>> >>> 4. Will my IDE (Flash Builder) recognize changes I make to the >>>> >>>framework, in other words will re-building the framework from >>>>modified >>>> >>>source update this (3) folder? >>>> >> >>>> >>I'm not sure what configuration you are trying, but the source >>>>package >>>> >>really is like packaging up the parent folder of the 3 repos and the >>>> >>binary package is really like packaging up the parent folder of the >>>>3 >>>> >>repos after building everything. So if changes are detected today, >>>>they >>>> >>should be in this package too. >>>> >> >>>> >>HTH, >>>> >>-Alex >>>> >>> >>>> >>>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>> >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:03 AM >>>> >>>To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >>>> >>>Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >>>> >>> >>>> >>>I think I have the packaging scripts set up to package the 3 repos >>>>into >>>> >>>a >>>> >>>single source package. The nightly builds for the past few days >>>>have >>>> >>>been >>>> >>>churning out this new package. Folks should have noticed that the >>>> >>>IDE-compatible folder is now a royale-asjs subfolder in the binary >>>> >>>package. >>>> >>> >>>> >>>I'll be spending a bit more time on some final checks (like execute >>>>bits >>>> >>>on the scripts) but I think we're at the point where others should >>>> >>>review >>>> >>>the package to see if they like it or not and report things that >>>>need >>>> >>>improvement. If we want to bake in NPM artifact generation into >>>>the >>>> >>>scripts, we should get going on that now. >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Once we get consensus that this package structure is the one we >>>>want >>>>to >>>> >>>release, the next thing to try is to create a release candidate. >>>>My >>>> >>>current thinking is to use Maven to generate its per-repo source >>>> >>>packages >>>> >>>and alter the Ant script to grab the 3 packages and run the release >>>> >>>script >>>> >>>in those packages. >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Constructive feedback welcome, >>>> >>>-Alex >>>> >>> >>>> >>>On 12/5/17, 11:42 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>>Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it >>>>looks >>>> >>>>good >>>> >>>>till now. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant >>>>build >>>> >>>>for >>>> >>>>a >>>> >>>>while. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Thanks, Piotr >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop >>>>branch >>>> >>>>> locally. I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way >>>>first, >>>> >>>>> especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in >>>>the >>>> >>>>>compiler. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the CI >>>> >>>>>servers >>>> >>>>> if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows >>>>(the >>>> >>>>>CI >>>> >>>>> server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename). >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on >>>>feature/rename >>>> >>>>>before >>>> >>>>> the merge to develop. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks use >>>>a >>>> >>>>>clean >>>> >>>>> machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders >>>>and >>>> >>>>> environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and >>>>build >>>> >>>>> everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the >>>> >>>>>various >>>> >>>>> READMEs first. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> -Alex >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >Hi Alex, >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not >>>>sure >>>> >>>>> >whether >>>> >>>>> >I can push it to the rename - let me know. >>>> >>>>> >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that check >>>> >>>>>whether >>>> >>>>> >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do >>>>you >>>> >>>>>mean >>>> >>>>>by >>>> >>>>> >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did it >>>>by >>>> >>>>>maven >>>> >>>>> >but not sure whether it is sufficient. >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and everything >>>> >>>>>looks >>>> >>>>>ok. >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all >>>> >>>>>modules >>>> >>>>> >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - probably >>>>it >>>> >>>>>should >>>> >>>>> >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant. >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >Thanks, Piotr >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki >>>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How >>>>to >>>> >>>>>download >>>> >>>>> >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It should >>>> >>>>>describe >>>> >>>>> >>what >>>> >>>>> >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in >>>>order >>>>to >>>> >>>>>have >>>> >>>>> >>SWF >>>> >>>>> >> output. >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary >>>>package" - >>>> >>>>>It >>>> >>>>> >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex >>>>project. >>>> >>>>>I >>>> >>>>> >>believe >>>> >>>>> >> there could be more people like me. >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> Thanks, Piotr >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui >>>><aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one >>>>post... >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, >>>>the >>>> >>>>>nightly >>>> >>>>> >>>for >>>> >>>>> >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but >>>>not >>>>SWF >>>> >>>>> >>>output. >>>> >>>>> >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can >>>>never) >>>> >>>>>bundle >>>> >>>>> >>>the >>>> >>>>> >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF >>>>output. >>>> >>>>>The >>>> >>>>> >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the Adobe >>>>bits >>>> >>>>>after >>>> >>>>> >>> you download them. >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that the >>>> >>>>>source >>>> >>>>>zip >>>> >>>>> >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos >>>>(royals-compiler, >>>> >>>>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the >>>> >>>>>JSOnly >>>> >>>>> >>>binary >>>> >>>>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" >>>>nightly >>>> >>>>>but >>>> >>>>>in >>>> >>>>> >>>a >>>> >>>>> >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash >>>>Builder >>>> >>>>>and >>>> >>>>> >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again >>>>require >>>> >>>>> >>>running an >>>> >>>>> >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits. >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially >>>>something >>>> >>>>>you >>>> >>>>> >>>choose >>>> >>>>> >>> early when deciding what package to download. I'm not sure >>>>how, >>>> >>>>>under >>>> >>>>> >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in >>>>of >>>> >>>>>the >>>> >>>>> >>> SWF-only bits. Binary artifacts are supposed to be the >>>>results >>>> >>>>>of >>>> >>>>>a >>>> >>>>> >>> compilation of a source package. I suppose we could create >>>>some >>>> >>>>>sort >>>> >>>>> >>>of >>>> >>>>> >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly binary. >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven >>>>users >>>> >>>>>you >>>> >>>>> >>>choose >>>> >>>>> >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe >>>> >>>>>airglobal/playerglobal >>>> >>>>> >>> dependencies to your POM. These dependencies are in by >>>>default >>>> >>>>>for >>>> >>>>>the >>>> >>>>> >>> examples. Although it occurs to me that MDLExample >>>>shouldn't >>>> >>>>>have >>>> >>>>> >>>them, >>>> >>>>> >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow. >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow >>>>night. >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> HTH, >>>> >>>>> >>> -Alex >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of >>>>OmPrakash >>>> >>>>> >>>Muppirala" >>>> >>>>> >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> >>> >wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that >>>>package >>>>[1] >>>> >>>>>and >>>> >>>>> >>>have >>>> >>>>> >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js. >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >[1] >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%<<http<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c%3chttp> >>>>>>>>>>s<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3 >>>>>>>>>>c%3chttps<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http >>>>>>>>>>%3A%25%3c%3chttps%3chttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com >>>>>>>>>>/?url=http%3A%25%3c%3chttps>> >>>>>>>>>>:<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3 >>>>>>>>>>c >>>>>>>>>>%3chttps:> >>>>>>>>>>//na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25%3c> >>>> https://n >>>> >>>>>>a >>>> >>>>>>>>>>0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% >>>>>>>>>>2 >>>>>>>>>>F >>>>>>>>>>na01.safelinks.protection.outlook&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.c >>>>>>>>>>o >>>>>>>>>>m >>>>>>>>>>%7C6c1b1a5764ed4b58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178d >>>>>>>>>>e >>>>>>>>>>c >>>>>>>>>>ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487578222154409&sdata=pza1pv62ZBM4JLaRzsF7A7OJv9 >>>>>>>>>>H >>>>>>>>>>R >>>>>>>>>>CliGr1jk7xOjGWQ%3D&reserved=0. >>>> com/?url=http%3A%25%3chtt >>>> >>>>>>p >>>> >>>>>>s://na0> >>>> >>>>>>1.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%25> >>>> >>>>> >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex >>>> >>>>> >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01% >>>> 7Caharui% >>>> >>>>> >>> 40adobe.co >>>> >>>>> >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae >>>> >>>>> >>> d2c178decee1%7C >>>> >>>>> >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ >>>> >>>>> >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV >>>> >>>>> >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>>>> >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >That's good to know. I should be able to use this in the >>>>npm >>>> >>>>>package >>>> >>>>> >>> >right? >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>> >Om >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >Thanks, Piotr >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala >>>> >>>>><bigosma...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> >>> >wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" >>>> >>>>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> Hi Om, >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are >>>>downloading >>>>one >>>> >>>>>zip >>>> >>>>> >>>file >>>> >>>>> >>> >and >>>> >>>>> >>> >> using it in IDE. >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately? >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>> >> Om >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> Piotr >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala >>>> >>>>> >>><bigosma...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release package >>>>all >>>> >>>>>the >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file? >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > Om >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the >>>>better. >>>> >>>>>The >>>> >>>>> >>> >> decisions >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as >>>> >>>>>possible >>>> >>>>> >>>and >>>> >>>>> >>> >>make >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > our >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can >>>>release >>>> >>>>>often. >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < >>>> >>>>> >>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > I would also see in the develop Harbs >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your >>>> >>>>>merge. >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow. >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> -- >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> Piotr Zarzycki >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> Patreon: >>>> >>>>> >>* >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>> >>>>>a >>>> >>>>>t >>>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 >>>> >>>>>>>6 >>>> >>>>>>>4 >>>> >>>>>>>8 >>>> >>>>>>>14 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D >>>> >>>>>>>& >>>> >>>>>>>r >>>> >>>>>>>e >>>> >>>>>>>se >>>> >>>>> >>rved=0 >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >>< >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>> >>>>>a >>>> >>>>>t >>>> >>>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd4443 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63 >>>> >>>>>>>6 >>>> >>>>>>>4 >>>> >>>>>>>8 >>>> >>>>>>>14 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D >>>> >>>>>>>& >>>> >>>>>>>r >>>> >>>>>>>e >>>> >>>>>>>se >>>> >>>>> >>rved=0>* >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >-- >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >Piotr Zarzycki >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> >Patreon: >>>> >>>>> >* >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>> >>>>>a >>>> >>>>>t >>>> >>>>>r >>>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 >>>> >>>>>>1 >>>> >>>>>>4 >>>> >>>>>>1 >>>> >>>>>>58 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res >>>> >>>>>>e >>>> >>>>>>r >>>> >>>>>>v >>>> >>>>>>ed >>>> >>>>> >=0 >>>> >>>>> >< >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p >>>> >>>>>a >>>> >>>>>t >>>> >>>>>r >>>> >>>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >>>> >>>>> %7Cb14108fd444342 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648 >>>> >>>>>>1 >>>> >>>>>>4 >>>> >>>>>>1 >>>> >>>>>>58 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD% >>>> 2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&res >>>> >>>>>>e >>>> >>>>>>r >>>> >>>>>>v >>>> >>>>>>ed >>>> >>>>> >=0>* >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>> >>>Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>>Patreon: >>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pa >>>t >>>r >>>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed >>>4 >>>b >>>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648757 >>>8 >>>2 >>>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&reserv >>>e >>>d >>>=0 >>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pa >>>t >>>r >>>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1b1a5764ed >>>4 >>>b >>>58c02f08d542148301%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63648757 >>>8 >>>2 >>>22154409&sdata=7TxhOQp2UCwhWbmuizcp%2FNN2%2FwJIkDXVmebfkqB2IF4%3D&reserv >>>e >>>d >>>=0>* >>> >> >
