I agree.
> On Jan 3, 2018, at 6:57 AM, Olaf Krueger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I would just like to mention that from my point of view it I would be really
> helpful to have a first Royale release soon, e.g. 0.9.0.
> After that, Royale could evolve by minor versions like 0.9.1, 0.9.2, etc.
>
> I agree with Carlos that there is still a way to go regarding missing stuff
> and the developer experience but I think we should address those things to
> the first major release 1.0.0.
> I also agree that there is a danger that folks who starts with exploring
> Royale will be dissapointed and leave. To avoid this we should mention
> anywhere and as often as possible that Royale is still under development...
> but also ready for building apps.
>
> AFAIK Josh is on hold with his VSCode extension until the first Royale
> version is released.
> And maybe other users from the Flex lists who doesn't follow all those posts
> are lost cause Royale acts a bit in the dark at the moment.
> I could imagine that users who would like to get in touch with Royale don't
> want to start with the FlexJS version but also don't know where to find a
> appropriate Royale version.
>
> I am trying to work as often as possible on our little TryItNow app using
> Royale.
> I started from scratch and I really hope to provide this app with a nice
> look and feel which follows Carlos website design. If this will be
> successful we'll have one part of the Royale website that is implemented by
> using Royale at least.
>
> Just my 2 cents,
> Olaf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
