Thanks Olaf! Good to know that we don't have that restriction anymore. I'd like to get Piotr and Carlos's opinions about removing the MDL examples since they worked so hard on it. I'm finishing up changing the file headers to reflect that these two examples are under Google's copyright and license.
-Alex On 1/16/18, 12:47 PM, "Olaf Krueger" <[email protected]> wrote: >Alex, it works!!!! [1] > >Regarding the MDL examples: >If there still IP and license issues left I would like to suggest to >remove >the affected examples from RC2 until we've resolved those problems. (I am >not sure if you already did it). > >Regarding the [y]/[n] questions during the approval: >During my tests, I've always entered [y] like a monkey with the focus on >testing the script. >What does this question about 'unexpected binaries' [2] mean and how >should >I check it? > >However, I am looking forward to the RC2 and, hopefully, a smooth release >process :-) >Thanks for your patient! > >Olaf > > >[1] >BUILD SUCCESSFUL >Total time: 34 minutes 42 seconds > >[2] >Check that there are no unexpected binaries. Is it ok? (y, [n]) > > > > >-- >Sent from: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-roy >ale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7 >C066714a0a4d14f01d85808d55d22621f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7 >C0%7C636517324616345561&sdata=RtRvGTu1N2FPJSB7Y3np6Q%2Fn%2BIZzYHCg5%2F%2Bi >b%2BUnN%2Bc%3D&reserved=0
