On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> Thanks Olaf! Good to know that we don't have that restriction anymore. > > I'd like to get Piotr and Carlos's opinions about removing the MDL > examples since they worked so hard on it. I'm finishing up changing the > file headers to reflect that these two examples are under Google's > copyright and license. > +1 to exclude the MDL examples from this release. Let's find a good way to fix the IP issues in our next release. Thanks, Om > > -Alex > > On 1/16/18, 12:47 PM, "Olaf Krueger" <m...@olafkrueger.net> wrote: > > >Alex, it works!!!! [1] > > > >Regarding the MDL examples: > >If there still IP and license issues left I would like to suggest to > >remove > >the affected examples from RC2 until we've resolved those problems. (I am > >not sure if you already did it). > > > >Regarding the [y]/[n] questions during the approval: > >During my tests, I've always entered [y] like a monkey with the focus on > >testing the script. > >What does this question about 'unexpected binaries' [2] mean and how > >should > >I check it? > > > >However, I am looking forward to the RC2 and, hopefully, a smooth release > >process :-) > >Thanks for your patient! > > > >Olaf > > > > > >[1] > >BUILD SUCCESSFUL > >Total time: 34 minutes 42 seconds > > > >[2] > >Check that there are no unexpected binaries. Is it ok? (y, [n]) > > > > > > > > > >-- > >Sent from: > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fapache-roy > >ale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7 > >C066714a0a4d14f01d85808d55d22621f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7 > >C0%7C636517324616345561&sdata=RtRvGTu1N2FPJSB7Y3np6Q% > 2Fn%2BIZzYHCg5%2F%2Bi > >b%2BUnN%2Bc%3D&reserved=0 > >
