I am fine with using MarkDown if someone can assure me that there will,
eventually, be a way to display a navigable index that will help the reader
jump around through the pages.

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:

> OK, I'm sure you will figure it out.  But if we all agree on MarkDown, I
> think we can start writing content in MarkDown and committing it?  Then
> later, the theme will just magically appear or maybe we have to add a tag
> or two to each page?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 1/18/18, 3:36 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >I'm right now fighting with Jekyll and themes. I have working a minimal
> >example localy and trying to see how to:
> >
> >* Jekyll themes work in order to configure a basic one with basic website
> >royale branding (fonts, colors and sizes)
> >* How this means for ease of development, I'm still trying to see the
> >whole
> >picture
> >
> >I'll come back with my research
> >
> >Carlos
> >
> >
> >2018-01-19 0:23 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> I've been thinking that we don't want to directly copy the FlexJS pages
> >>to
> >> GH Pages.  I think it needs better organization.  I think the question
> >>for
> >> you is how much time you have and what you would like to do with your
> >> time.  I'm hoping to spend some time on doc once RC2 is posted.  I can
> >> certainly type in a lot of words.  If your strong suit and time is
> >>better
> >> aimed at editing and organization, then we should find a way to make
> >>that
> >> work.  If you have a vision of the organization of the doc and want to
> >>put
> >> together the skeleton of the doc set and leave lots of placeholders, I
> >>can
> >> try to fill in those placeholders and you can edit it after.
> >>
> >> I've looked at the Adobe doc a bit.  I'm not sure that's what I want
> >> either, but it made me realize that we don't have pages like "What is
> >> MXML" and how to use it.  We are for now assuming folks are
> >> Flex-knowledgeable, which I think is ok.
> >>
> >> I think we do need to use MarkDown and Jekyll (or maybe Royale).  I was
> >> trying to think through how to get the branding around a pile of HTML
> >> pages.  Doesn't sound easy.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 1/18/18, 3:15 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> >>Rovira"
> >> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Andrew,
> >> >
> >> >I think the initial approach is ok. We need to work all together since
> >>we
> >> >need:
> >> >
> >> >* Technical info that is accurate to help people get started or solve a
> >> >problem with some part of Royale
> >> >* Be as clear as possible in terms of organization (how to organize the
> >> >content), grammatical constructs, and more.
> >> >
> >> >So this task needs some kind of retro feedback between people working
> >>in
> >> >docs and people working on code.
> >> >
> >> >I'm working in parallel in a theme for the docs, still looking how it's
> >> >done, but hope to let you know something as I have things more clear.
> >> >
> >> >thanks
> >> >
> >> >Carlos
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >2018-01-18 1:04 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore <cottag...@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi, all:
> >> >>
> >> >> I want to start upgrading the very useful documentation we have that
> >> >> currently refers to FlexJS [1]. At the very least every document
> >>needs
> >> >> edits to make sure it refers to Royale.
> >> >>
> >> >> However, there are some other considerations:
> >> >>
> >> >>    - Is there material that needs to be rewritten because Royale has
> >> >>    evolved away from FlexJS? I will need help identifying stuff that
> >>is
> >> >> out of
> >> >>    phase with the current project.
> >> >>    - The existing material is good, but not comprehensive. I'll be
> >> >>happy to
> >> >>    help extend the documentation, building out along the lines
> >> >>indicated by
> >> >>    the stub table of contents here: [2]. However, I am primarily a
> >> >>writer
> >> >> who
> >> >>    dabbles in code, rather than a coder who writes. I see two ways
> >> >>forward:
> >> >>       - I write material using my naive best-guess approach and my
> >> >>library
> >> >>       of Flex resources, and then people who are actually, you know,
> >> >> smart about
> >> >>       this stuff help me correct all my gaffes and oversights.
> >> >>       - People who know the code blurt out their information on a
> >> >>       particular topic without worrying too much about polishing it,
> >>and
> >> >> then I
> >> >>       help rework it until it is attractive and informative to the
> >> >>intended
> >> >>       audience.
> >> >>    - There should be a new blog entry every week at least so there is
> >> >>    almost always something fresh for a site visitor to enjoy. I can
> >> >>think
> >> >> of
> >> >>    lots of titles, but probably do not have the technical smarts to
> >>get
> >> >>all
> >> >>    the details right.
> >> >>
> >> >> This leaves to one side for the moment the question of whether we are
> >> >>using
> >> >> MarkDown or HTML for the documentation pages, although I think it is
> >> >>clear
> >> >> we are not using a wiki.
> >> >>
> >> >> 1.
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.ap
> >> >>ache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLEX%2FFlex%2BJS&
> >> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> >> >>40adobe.com%7C80debf76730a430634a708d55e64cddb%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
> >> >>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518709399733882&sdata=
> >> F4338HNri%2F6TU%2B%2BkcLVcNS%
> >> >>2FeCpiMC%2Bo7NMVidsK5d7Y%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>
> >> >> 2.
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> >>
> >>>>om%2Folafkrueger%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> 40adobe.com
> >> %7
> >> >>C80debf76730a430634a708d55e64cddb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%
> >> >>7C0%7C636518709399733882&sdata=S5XQQo5X1LPq5wpK6pxeSa4eNzcjj8
> >> 4epnrNZnQLsw
> >> >>o%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Andrew Wetmore
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14
> >> >>.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7C80debf76730a430634a7
> >> >>08d55e64cddb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518709399733
> >> >>882&sdata=qMP8jV2U9SnOXiEKOiZodsYZLZfQUz3FsBYE0xN4Wjw%3D&reserved=0
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Carlos Rovira
> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> >> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7C80debf76730a430634a708d5
> >> >5e64cddb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636518709399733882&s
> >> >data=JZEmwtXJfb7QH71Cnt6yCprASeLEDlzmGbIc%2BkBVM2M%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Carlos Rovira
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7Cc10f3bcdb7c845ab3c6508d5
> >5ecc66a2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636519154348905597&s
> >data=LddHhy3VBm431%2BCCTdVlIfQaLJ3wg4AiHuVkH%2FDeyeo%3D&reserved=0
>
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to