Here is how Electron does it with Github pages: Documentation result page: https://electronjs.org/docs/api/accelerator Source code: https://github.com/electron/electron/blob/master/docs/api/accelerator.md
Some documentation on how this works: https://github.com/electron/electronjs.org/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#documentation On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > This is for doc, not code so I'm not sure the issue I raised matters. > > That said, I've been reading this [1] and it seems like we should be able > to set up a few templates sort of like we did flex.a.o and not worry so > much about customizing a third-party theme. > > [1] https://jekyllrb.com/docs > > On 1/18/18, 5:28 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Carlos, > > > >I like your findings jeckyll theme doc. > > > >It looks like we may have again similar issue with license as we have in > >MDLExample. > > > >Can someone raise jira for both cases? Alex raises question on legal > >couple > >of days ago. No responses. Let's not wait block us with it - push things > >forward. Jira could be better to do this. > > > >Thanks, > >Piotr > > > >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, 02:08 Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > >wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> > I think this looks very good and seems to be responsive > >> > > >> > > >>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fmistic > >>100.github.io%2Fjekyll-bootstrap-doc&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7C > >>9c168d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7 > >>C0%7C636519220978547047&sdata=cUfWYBGYEBBEd% > 2FpwSfe9bxwJd6N%2BmnyMC0pK%2F > >>EepY8o%3D&reserved=0 > >> > [2] > >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c > >>om%2Fallejo%2Fjekyll-docs-theme&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7C9c168 > >>d0de9074f2fc06108d55edbea4f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C > >>636519220978547047&sdata=hY3xQXdzTO8RFF7COWVNJtd% > 2BzoXqck04VV68TxcIKFs%3D > >>&reserved=0 > >> > >> From a quick look this contains CSS code licensed under CC-BY-3.0 (looks > >> like it comes from bootstrap docs). That may or may not be an issue, > >> depending on the current conversation around this on legal discuss, and > >> what you want to do with it. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Justin > >
