Well, in Royale 0.8.0 the examples directory has a FlexJS directory with about 30 examples. Is that directory name still okay now that the project is no longer FlexJS?
Within examples, flexjs lingers on in namespaces: xmlns:js="library:// ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic" But I was mainly thinking of lovely examples and tutorials like Josh's "Hello FlexJS" [1] [1] https://nextgenactionscript.com/tutorials/hello-flexjs-web-application-development-mxml-actionscript/ On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > Which examples were you looking at? > > -Alex > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > ________________________________ > From: Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 7:12:33 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Preparing code for demos and doc > > I was looking at the tutorials and code samples we have available and think > pretty much everything needs to be reviewed and if necessary reworked so we > are showing for example <js:Label> instead of <s:Label>, and talking about > Royale instead of FlexJS in everything from text to directory names, to > avoid confusing or distracting readers. I am happy to do this with code > samples and documentation text, but the creators of demonstration apps > would be best positioned for that sort of migration. > > For posted, running demonstration apps, I guess we have a little time for > that migration; but anything we point to by the time Royale is at the 1.0 > release should probably be modeling what we want potential users to learn > to do. > > That's my thinking, anyhow. Opinions? > > a > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14. > blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7C17ff22331cfd4e8c412e08d56598671e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636526627641548902&sdata=xVgkE3frhAlosWP35e8eq% > 2BvUTAe3iKpGJDON%2F60x4KY%3D&reserved=0 > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
