Oh, that is great news. I guess I will approach authors of useful tutorials and other resources directly, to see if they would consider a rebranding rewrite.
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Gabe Harbs <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I’ve confirmed that all the examples still work. > > They are now in a “royale” directory. The namespaces should all have been > changed to royale as well. > > Harbs > > > On Jan 27, 2018, at 7:37 PM, Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Well, in Royale 0.8.0 the examples directory has a FlexJS directory with > > about 30 examples. Is that directory name still okay now that the project > > is no longer FlexJS? > > > > Within examples, flexjs lingers on in namespaces: xmlns:js="library:// > > ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic" > > > > But I was mainly thinking of lovely examples and tutorials like Josh's > > "Hello FlexJS" [1] > > > > [1] > > https://nextgenactionscript.com/tutorials/hello-flexjs- > web-application-development-mxml-actionscript/ > > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Which examples were you looking at? > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 7:12:33 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Preparing code for demos and doc > >> > >> I was looking at the tutorials and code samples we have available and > think > >> pretty much everything needs to be reviewed and if necessary reworked > so we > >> are showing for example <js:Label> instead of <s:Label>, and talking > about > >> Royale instead of FlexJS in everything from text to directory names, to > >> avoid confusing or distracting readers. I am happy to do this with code > >> samples and documentation text, but the creators of demonstration apps > >> would be best positioned for that sort of migration. > >> > >> For posted, running demonstration apps, I guess we have a little time > for > >> that migration; but anything we point to by the time Royale is at the > 1.0 > >> release should probably be modeling what we want potential users to > learn > >> to do. > >> > >> That's my thinking, anyhow. Opinions? > >> > >> a > >> > >> -- > >> Andrew Wetmore > >> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14. > >> blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > >> 7C17ff22331cfd4e8c412e08d56598671e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636526627641548902&sdata=xVgkE3frhAlosWP35e8eq% > >> 2BvUTAe3iKpGJDON%2F60x4KY%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
