(moving to dev list)

Hi I think this is a good tip that we can add to our Royale Blog in the
"Examples" category. And respect the user (ni this case Peter) as the
poster.

What do you think?

2018-02-06 15:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com>:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for looking into Apache Royale!
>
> As you know, mx:Canvas lets you place items using (x,y) positioning. You
> can do the same thing using either js:Group or js:Container with
> js:BasicLayout.
>
> js:Group is much lighter in weight then js:Container when running the app
> in the Flash Player; in the browser they are equivalent. js:Container can
> be made to scroll and js:Group cannot.
>
> If you do not need scrolling, use js:Group:
>
> <js:Group>
>     <js:beads>
>         <js:BasicLayout />
>     </js:beads>
>     <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height attributes ‹>
> </js:Group>
>
> If you do need scrolling, then you would use:
>
> <js:Container>
>     <js:beads>
>         <js:BasicLayout />
>         <js:ScrollingViewport />
>     </js:beads>
>     <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height attributes ‹>
> </js:Container>
>
> Regards,
> Peter Ent
> Adobe Systems/Apache Royale Project
>
>
> On 2/6/18, 4:46 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am using mx:Canvas and porting my app to Apache Flexjs/Royale I can't
> >find
> >any substitute of it.
> >
> >Kindly let me know if there is any other alternate for similar
> >functionality.
> >
> >
> >
> >Aleena
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to