IMO, the Express set should have a Canvas component that bundles those beads. I challenge someone besides Peter and me to create it!
Thanks, -Alex On 2/8/18, 3:13 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >So cool :) >Hope Peter could let us know what he thinks as well as well with the new >thread I just open about examples blog :) > >2018-02-08 12:06 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>: > >> Absolutely. I am also going to include this in the help docs list of >> features that you do one way in Flex and slightly differently in Royale. >> >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > (moving to dev list) >> > >> > Hi I think this is a good tip that we can add to our Royale Blog in >>the >> > "Examples" category. And respect the user (ni this case Peter) as the >> > poster. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> > 2018-02-06 15:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Thanks for looking into Apache Royale! >> > > >> > > As you know, mx:Canvas lets you place items using (x,y) positioning. >> You >> > > can do the same thing using either js:Group or js:Container with >> > > js:BasicLayout. >> > > >> > > js:Group is much lighter in weight then js:Container when running >>the >> app >> > > in the Flash Player; in the browser they are equivalent. >>js:Container >> can >> > > be made to scroll and js:Group cannot. >> > > >> > > If you do not need scrolling, use js:Group: >> > > >> > > <js:Group> >> > > <js:beads> >> > > <js:BasicLayout /> >> > > </js:beads> >> > > <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height >>attributes >> ‹> >> > > </js:Group> >> > > >> > > If you do need scrolling, then you would use: >> > > >> > > <js:Container> >> > > <js:beads> >> > > <js:BasicLayout /> >> > > <js:ScrollingViewport /> >> > > </js:beads> >> > > <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height >>attributes >> ‹> >> > > </js:Container> >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Peter Ent >> > > Adobe Systems/Apache Royale Project >> > > >> > > >> > > On 2/6/18, 4:46 AM, "Alina Kazi" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > >Hi, >> > > > >> > > >I am using mx:Canvas and porting my app to Apache Flexjs/Royale I >> can't >> > > >find >> > > >any substitute of it. >> > > > >> > > >Kindly let me know if there is any other alternate for similar >> > > >functionality. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >Aleena >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Carlos Rovira >> > >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me% >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C26a9a2644e9c491092af08 >>d56ee50f38%7C71f1da39c0a84d5a8d88a67b23c30bf4%7C0%7C0%7C63653685246919203 >>6&sdata=S3KwHgvUwpW5STJ%2BJb41%2Fe9j%2FcBDUz2s4ZjRuyDLDcg%3D&reserved=0 >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Andrew Wetmore >> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14 >>.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C26a9a2644e9c491092af >>08d56ee50f38%7C71f1da39c0a84d5a8d88a67b23c30bf4%7C0%7C0%7C636536852469192 >>036&sdata=ZdjtTBAGw55JysGANyB2zeOsksP0y%2BCTH2sCW8GuamA%3D&reserved=0 >> > > > >-- >Carlos Rovira >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C26a9a2644e9c491092af08d5 >6ee50f38%7C71f1da39c0a84d5a8d88a67b23c30bf4%7C0%7C0%7C636536852469192036&s >data=S3KwHgvUwpW5STJ%2BJb41%2Fe9j%2FcBDUz2s4ZjRuyDLDcg%3D&reserved=0
